Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lead field computation for the electrocardiographic inverse problem--finite elements versus boundary elements.

M Seger1, G Fischer, R Modre

  • 1Institute for Biomedical Signal Processing and Imaging, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Innrain 98, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. michael.seger@umit.at

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
|February 22, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biomedical Signal Processing.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016
Same author

Alterations of field potentials in isotropic cardiomyocyte cell layers induced by multiple endogenous pacemakers under normal and hypothermal conditions.

American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology·2014
Same author

Detection of Multiple Pacemaker Centers in Cardiomyocyte Cell Layers for Estimating Wavefront Propagation Patterns.

Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering·2013
Same author

An epidemiological modeling and data integration framework.

Methods of information in medicine·2010
Same author

Patient-specific volume conductor modeling for non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology.

The open medical informatics journal·2009
Same author

Calibration of an extreme-ultraviolet transmission grating spectrometer with synchrotron radiation.

Applied optics·2008

This study compares the Boundary Element Method (BEM) and Finite Element Method (FEM) for calculating electrocardiography lead field matrices. BEM offers higher accuracy and speed, while FEM can incorporate anisotropic conductivity for future cardiac modeling.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computational Electrophysiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Solving the inverse problem of electrocardiography requires accurate calculation of the lead field matrix.
  • The Boundary Element Method (BEM) and Finite Element Method (FEM) are two common approaches for this calculation.
  • Comparing their performance is crucial for advancing electrocardiographic imaging techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy, computational efficiency, and memory requirements of BEM and FEM for lead field matrix calculation.
  • To evaluate the impact of using BEM- or FEM-derived matrices on inversely calculated myocardial activation times.
  • To assess the potential of FEM in handling anisotropic conductivities for future electrophysiological models.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementation and comparison of BEM and FEM for computing the lead field matrix using a spherical model.
  • Analysis of relative errors against analytical solutions.
  • Evaluation of computation time and memory usage.
  • Application of computed matrices to inverse problems for myocardial activation time estimation.

Main Results:

  • BEM demonstrated smaller relative errors compared to analytical solutions at similar discretization levels.
  • BEM required less computation time but more memory than FEM.
  • Both BEM and FEM computed lead field matrices yielded similar myocardial activation time patterns when used in inverse calculations.
  • FEM's capability to consider anisotropic conductivities was highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • BEM provides a more accurate and computationally efficient method for lead field matrix calculation in simpler models.
  • FEM offers advantages for future complex models by accommodating anisotropic conductivities and myocardial fiber architecture.
  • The choice between BEM and FEM depends on the specific requirements of the inverse problem and model complexity.