Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mutation at high rates reduces spatial structure within populations.

Bryan K Epperson1

  • 1126 Natural Resources Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA. epperson@msu.edu

Molecular Ecology
|February 23, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

GENE DISPERSAL AND SPATIAL GENETIC STRUCTURE.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

LIMITED SEED DISPERSAL AND GENETIC STRUCTURE IN LIFE STAGES OF CECROPIA OBTUSIFOLIA.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT VARIATION FOR OUTCROSSING RATE AMONG FLOWER-COLOR MORPHS OF IPOMOEA PURPUREA.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

FINE-SCALE SPATIAL STRUCTURE: CORRELATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL GENOTYPES DIFFER FROM THOSE FOR LOCAL GENE FREQUENCIES.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

SPATIAL GENETIC STRUCTURE OF CLONAL AND SEXUAL REPRODUCTION IN POPULATIONS OF ADENOPHORA GRANDIFLORA (CAMPANULACEAE).

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

Spatial pattern of allozyme variation in a contact zone of Pinus Ponderosa and P. arizonica (Pinaceae).

American journal of botany·2011
Same journal

Refugia, but Not for Everyone: Genetic Structure Differentiates Shallow and Mesophotic Populations of the Brooder Sponge Ircinia variabilis.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Leafcutter Ant Farmers Prevent Loss of Edible Symbiotic Structures by Maintaining Allelic Diversity in Their Multinucleate Fungal Crop.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Resolving Emergent Patterns in Community Genetics With Environmental DNA.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Genomic Offsets Predict Survival With Low Accuracy in a Marine Common Garden.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Differential Immune Responses Correlate With Chytridiomycosis Severity in Italian Crested Newts.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same journal

Demography and Environment Shapes Genetic Variation: Spatiotemporal Genetic Dynamics in Cyclic Voles at Low Latitudes.

Molecular ecology·2026
See all related articles

High mutation rates significantly reduce spatial genetic structure in populations. This effect is pronounced for hypervariable markers, potentially skewing estimates of population dispersal.

Area of Science:

  • Population Genetics
  • Molecular Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Spatial genetic structure is crucial for understanding population dynamics.
  • Hypervariable markers are widely used to study genetic variation.
  • High mutation rates (mu) can potentially influence genetic structure measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of high mutation rates on empirical measures of spatial genetic variation.
  • To assess how mutation rates affect spatial correlations and kinship measures.
  • To determine the implications for estimating population dispersal distances.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations were used to model genetic variation under varying mutation rates.
  • Measures of spatial structure, including Moran's I and conditional kinship, were analyzed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The influence of forward mutations, allele number, and back mutations was examined.

    • Main Results:

    • High mutation rates (mu = 10(-2)) approximately halved spatial structure measures.
    • Finest spatial-scale correlations (Moran's I, conditional kinship) decreased by 30%-50%.
    • Lower mutation rates caused negligible reductions; effects were largely independent of other factors.

    Conclusions:

    • Hypervariable loci exhibit reduced spatial structuring at high mutation rates.
    • Marker selection is critical, as it can influence observed spatial genetic variation.
    • High mutation rates can inflate dispersal estimates derived from fine-scale correlations.