Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?

Masanobu Takahashi1, Satoru Saito

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of the Sacred Heart, Hiroo 4-chome 3-1, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8938, Japan. mtakahas@u-sacred-heart.ac.jp

Memory (Hove, England)
|February 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Post-adjuvant chemotherapy in ctDNA-positive patients with resected colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Postoperative adjuvant eribulin in high-risk patients with soft tissue sarcoma: A retrospective study of eight cases.

Rare tumors·2026
Same author

People are sensitive to environmental predictability when engaging cognitive control.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Association between antibiotic use, immune-related adverse events, and efficacy of immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

International journal of clinical oncology·2026
Same author

Inverse Relation Between Responses to Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy and Subsequent Cetuximab Plus Paclitaxel in Head and Neck Cancer: Role of the Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Signaling Pathway.

JCO precision oncology·2026
Same author

Waiting Longer With Less Work: The Impact of Habits and Social Trust on Children's Delay of Gratification.

Developmental science·2026
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

Collaborative inhibition, where groups recall less than individuals, disappears when memory recall is delayed. This suggests timing impacts group memory performance and the effectiveness of collaborative remembering.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Previous research indicates collaborative groups exhibit 'collaborative inhibition,' recalling less information than the pooled performance of individuals (nominal groups).
  • This phenomenon suggests that group interaction can hinder memory recall compared to individual efforts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the phenomenon of collaborative inhibition in group memory recall.
  • To examine the effect of delayed recall on collaborative inhibition.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms, such as cross-cueing, contributing to collaborative inhibition.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted where participants initially recalled story material individually.
  • In Experiment 1, some participants then recalled collaboratively, while a control group recalled individually again.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2 manipulated recall timing, introducing a one-week delay between initial individual recall and subsequent collaborative or individual recall.

    • Main Results:

    • Experiment 1 replicated previous findings, demonstrating collaborative inhibition where collaborative pairs recalled less than nominal groups.
    • Experiment 2 found that collaborative inhibition was eliminated when recall was delayed by one week.
    • The results indicate that the timing of recall significantly influences group memory dynamics.

    Conclusions:

    • Collaborative inhibition is evident in immediate recall situations.
    • The detrimental effect of collaborative inhibition diminishes or disappears with delayed recall.
    • Cross-cueing during collaborative remembering may play a role in immediate recall inhibition but is less impactful in delayed recall scenarios.