Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
[Prognostic value of the parameters of left ventricular systolic function in patients with heart failure]
Jarosław Drozdz1, Maria Krzemińska-Pakuła, Radosław Krecki
1Klinika Kardiologii, Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Lodzi. drozdz@ptkardio.pl
Insights
Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is the most crucial predictor of survival in patients with systolic dysfunction. While other methods like wall motion score index and dP/dt assess systolic function, they do not offer significant prognostic value.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Physiology
Background:
- Assessing left ventricular (LV) systolic function is vital for patient prognosis.
- Traditional methods like ejection fraction (EF) are influenced by loading conditions.
- Alternative methods such as wall motion score index (WMSI) and LV pressure rise (dP/dt) have been proposed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the prognostic value of EF, WMSI, and dP/dt in patients with systolic dysfunction.
- To determine which parameter best predicts mortality in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 75 patients with diverse systolic dysfunction underwent assessment using EF, WMSI, and dP/dt.
- Follow-up data was collected over a mean period of 38 months.
- Multivariate logistic analysis was employed to identify significant prognostic factors.
Main Results:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) showed the closest correlation with dP/dt (R²=0.50).
- During follow-up, 53% of patients died.
- Only EF was a significant predictor of mortality (p=0.001) in multivariate analysis, while WMSI (p=0.12) and dP/dt (p=0.16) were not.
Conclusions:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction remains the most significant parameter for prognostic evaluation in patients with reduced systolic function.
- Left ventricular pressure rise (dP/dt) reflects systolic function but lacks prognostic impact.
Unlabelled:
There are several parameters of left ventricular (LV) systolic function assessment. The calculation of the ejection fraction (EF) strongly relates to the preload and afterload conditions. Wall motion score index (WMSI) seems to be to impractical as the semi-quantitative method. Measurement of the LV pressure rise by Doppler evaluation of mitral regurgitation is a reproducible and an accurate method for dP/dt evaluation. As a method for LV systolic function estimation it does not depend on loading conditions. We have compared the prognostic value of these three methods in patients with a broad spectrum of systolic dysfunction. The study group consisted of 75 patients evaluated by all these methods in years 1995-1999 in our echocardiographic laboratory (73%--men, mean 54 +/- 12 years). In 13 patients the coronary artery disease was diagnosed but LV function was apparently normal, in 35--regional dysfunction after myocardial infarction was described, and in 27--global dysfunction due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The EF ranged from 11% to 70% (mean 34 +/- 14%), WMSI--from 1 to 3.6 points (mean 2.2 +/- 0.7), and dP/dt from 235 to 4000 mmHg/s (mean 1108 +/- 698 mmHg/s). The closest relationship was noted between EF and dP/dt (R2=0.50). During 38 +/- 19 months of follow-up, 40 patients died (53%). In the multivariate logistic analysis the only significant parameter related to prognosis was EF (p=0.001). WMSI (p=0.12) and dP/dt (p=0.16) were not statistically significant correlated to death.
Conclusion:
The left ventricular ejection fraction still remains the most important parameter for the evaluation of prognosis in patients with depressed systolic function. Left ventricular pressure rise describes the systolic function but does not have impact on the prognostic evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Heart Failure I: Introduction
