Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

19:44
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
Published on: June 3, 2009
Likelihood ratios: a simple and flexible statistic for empirical psychologists
1Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. scott.glover@rhul.ac.uk
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|March 1, 2005
Summary
Likelihood ratios offer a simpler, more interpretable statistical approach for psychology research compared to traditional null hypothesis significance testing. This method directly compares model fits, enhancing clarity for empirical arguments and statistical needs.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Statistical Inference
- Quantitative Research Methods
Background:
- Empirical psychology commonly utilizes null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) for statistical inferences.
- NHST presents challenges in interpretability and flexibility for researchers.
- A need exists for more straightforward statistical alternatives in psychological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose likelihood ratios as a more direct and interpretable alternative to NHST in empirical psychology.
- To evaluate the utility of likelihood ratios for addressing the statistical needs of psychological researchers.
- To demonstrate the advantages of likelihood ratios over traditional inferential statistics.
Main Methods:
- A survey of empirical articles in psychology was conducted to examine common statistical practices.
- The application of likelihood ratios was assessed for various statistical needs identified in the survey.
- Comparison of interpretability and flexibility between likelihood ratios and NHST.
Main Results:
- Likelihood ratios provide a direct measure of the fit between two competing statistical models.
- The statistic quantifies the relative likelihood of the data under best-fit models.
- Survey results indicate likelihood ratios can fulfill essential statistical requirements in psychology research.
Conclusions:
- Likelihood ratios offer a more intuitive and easily interpretable statistical framework for empirical psychology.
- This approach provides researchers with greater flexibility in constructing empirical arguments.
- Likelihood ratios represent a superior alternative to traditional inferential statistics for psychological research.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Fisher's Exact Test
Fisher's exact test is a statistical significance test widely used to analyze 2x2 contingency tables, particularly in situations where sample sizes are small. Unlike the chi-squared test, which approximates P-values and assumes minimum expected frequencies of at least five in each cell, Fisher's exact test calculates the exact probability (P-value) of observing the data or more extreme results under the null hypothesis. This feature makes it especially valuable when the assumptions of the...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
Relative Risk
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Odds Ratio
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

