Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deformation and Collectivity in Doubly Magic ^{208}Pb.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Reply to: Possible overestimation of isomer depletion due to contamination.

Nature·2021
Same author

Longitudinal Wobbling Motion in ^{187}Au.

Physical review letters·2020
Same author

Evidence for Rigid Triaxial Deformation in ^{76}Ge from a Model-Independent Analysis.

Physical review letters·2019
Same author

Masses and β-Decay Spectroscopy of Neutron-Rich Odd-Odd ^{160,162}Eu Nuclei: Evidence for a Subshell Gap with Large Deformation at N=98.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Isomer depletion as experimental evidence of nuclear excitation by electron capture.

Nature·2018
Same journal

Erratum: journal of comparative physiology a (1999) 184: 481-488.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2014
Same journal

Online first publication.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2014
Same journal

Adaptation in chemoreceptor cells. II. The effects of cross-adapting backgrounds depend on spectral tuning.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2012
Same journal

Acetylcholine activates a chloride channel as well as glutamate and GABA.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2011
Same journal

Pharmacological brain stimulation releases elaborate stridulatory behaviour in gomphocerine grasshoppers--conclusions for the organization of the central nervous control.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2004
Same journal

Presynaptic effects of octopamine, serotonin, and cocktails of the two modulators on neuromuscular transmission in crustaceans.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2004
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

Z M Fuzessery1, D J Hartley, J J Wenstrup

  • 1Department of Zoology/Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071.

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study examines how the greater mustache bat optimizes its hearing system to locate prey. By analyzing how the bat emits sound pulses and receives echoes through its ears, researchers discovered that these two processes work together to stabilize sound intensity at the center of the bat's field of view. This stabilization helps the bat accurately judge the direction of objects.

Keywords:
auditory perceptionacoustic signal processingPteronotus parnelliispatial tuninginferior colliculus

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve
10:53

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve

Published on: October 8, 2014

Multiscale Investigations of Cortical Processing by Integrating Laminar Polytrodes and Optogenetics with Micro Electrocorticography in Rodents
07:52

Multiscale Investigations of Cortical Processing by Integrating Laminar Polytrodes and Optogenetics with Micro Electrocorticography in Rodents

Published on: May 23, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve
10:53

Optogenetic Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve

Published on: October 8, 2014

Multiscale Investigations of Cortical Processing by Integrating Laminar Polytrodes and Optogenetics with Micro Electrocorticography in Rodents
07:52

Multiscale Investigations of Cortical Processing by Integrating Laminar Polytrodes and Optogenetics with Micro Electrocorticography in Rodents

Published on: May 23, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Sensory biology and echolocation system optimization within neuroethology
  • Acoustic signal processing and spatial perception in mustache bat models

Background:

No prior work had fully resolved how the greater mustache bat integrates pulse emission and ear reception for spatial navigation. That uncertainty drove researchers to investigate the acoustic properties of this specialized echolocation system. Prior research has shown that both the sound source and the receiver shape directional hearing. This gap motivated a detailed analysis of the radiation patterns and ear sensitivity across multiple harmonic frequencies. It was already known that bats rely on precise auditory cues to hunt in complex environments. That knowledge provided a foundation for examining how these animals achieve high spatial resolution. This study addresses the interaction between emitted energy spread and external ear filtering. No previous investigation had quantified the combined attenuation effects across the frontal sound field at these specific harmonic levels.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to determine the mechanisms behind spatial processing optimization in the greater mustache bat. Researchers sought to understand how the bat's physical attributes contribute to its directional hearing capabilities. The investigation focuses on the interplay between the emitted pulse and the reception of echoes. This problem is motivated by the need to explain how bats maintain high accuracy in complex acoustic environments. The authors intended to quantify the contribution of both the emitter and the receiver to the overall system directionality. By measuring these components, they aimed to clarify how the bat stabilizes sound intensity for better target analysis. This work addresses the uncertainty regarding how different harmonic frequencies influence spatial tuning. The study provides a framework for evaluating how these animals resolve directional information during flight.

Main Methods:

The team quantified the spatial properties of the greater mustache bat by mapping the frontal sound field. They calculated the total echo attenuation by summing pulse energy spread and ear-based filtering effects. A reference microphone at the field center allowed for precise calibration of the emitted pulse radiation patterns. Researchers presented free-field sounds to determine the intensity thresholds of specific auditory neurons. These measurements were conducted across three distinct harmonic frequencies to ensure comprehensive data collection. The approach involved comparing the output of a mobile microphone against the stationary reference device. Scientists recorded cochlear microphonic potentials to assess the directional sensitivity of the external ears. This systematic evaluation provided a detailed profile of the acoustic environment experienced by the animal.

Main Results:

The echolocation system exhibits significantly higher directionality at the center of the sound field than ear sensitivity alone. Peripheral sound attenuation increases by 10 to 13 dB across all tested harmonic frequencies. The areas of maximum sound intensity contract toward the center of the field during the emission process. Isointensity contours demonstrate greater radial symmetry about the center compared to ear-only measurements. At 60 kHz, the sound intensity remains nearly constant within 26 degrees of the center on either side. This stability creates an optimized acoustic environment for analyzing various aspects of the target. The researchers found that the radiation pattern and ear directionality complement each other to produce these effects. These findings provide a quantitative basis for understanding how the bat achieves high spatial resolution during hunting.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the echolocation system achieves superior directionality compared to ear sensitivity alone. This synthesis suggests that the radiation pattern and ear filtering act in concert to stabilize stimulus intensity. Such stabilization likely enhances the bat's ability to analyze target characteristics effectively. The researchers imply that this mechanism assists in resolving interaural intensity differences for prey localization. These findings indicate that the system is optimized for the central portion of the sound field. The data show that isointensity contours become more radially symmetrical through this combined process. The authors conclude that the observed acoustic environment supports more precise spatial processing. This review of the literature confirms that the bat's auditory system is finely tuned for its hunting requirements.

The researchers propose that the echolocation system stabilizes sound intensity at the center of the frontal field. This mechanism allows the bat to resolve interaural intensity differences more effectively, facilitating precise prey localization compared to systems relying solely on ear directionality.

The study utilizes cochlear microphonic potentials and monaural neurons in the inferior colliculus to measure ear sensitivity. These physiological responses provide a direct assessment of how the animal perceives sound intensity across different spatial locations.

The researchers measured the system at 30 kHz, 60 kHz, and 90 kHz harmonics. These specific frequencies are necessary to characterize the full range of the bat's echolocation pulse and understand how different harmonics contribute to spatial tuning.

The study integrates pulse radiation patterns with external ear directionality data. This combined data type allows for the calculation of total echo attenuation, revealing how the bat's physical structure and signal emission work together to shape its acoustic environment.

The researchers observed that sound intensity along the azimuth remains nearly constant within 26 degrees of the center at 60 kHz. This phenomenon suggests a highly stable acoustic zone that contrasts with the peripheral field where attenuation increases by 10 to 13 dB.

The authors propose that this intensity stabilization allows the bat to resolve interaural intensity differences. They suggest that this capability is a direct consequence of the complementary nature of the pulse radiation and ear directionality.