Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Who should get the kidney machine?

M J Langford

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |March 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study addresses resource allocation for patients by proposing a decision model. It balances patient prognosis and life-threatening needs with ethical considerations like utilitarian value and inherent human worth.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Difficulties associated with the development and licensing of vaccines for protection against bio-warfare and bio-terrorism.

    Developments in biologicals·2002
    Same author

    Protection against botulinum toxins provided by passive immunization with botulinum human immune globulin: evaluation using an inhalation model.

    Journal of applied toxicology : JAT·1999
    Same author

    Effect of palytoxin on endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxation in rat aortic rings.

    Journal of applied toxicology : JAT·1995
    Same author

    Immunohistochemical analysis of spontaneous pancreatic islet amyloid deposits in nonhuman primates.

    Veterinary pathology·1994
    Same author

    The Moot Court in teaching bioethics.

    Nurse education today·1990
    Same author

    Fluid resuscitation after an otherwise fatal hemorrhage: I. Crystalloid solutions.

    The Journal of trauma·1986
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Not all personal utilities are equal: a two-tier normative framework for genomic health technology assessment.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Correction: Harms of the current global anti-FGM campaign.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Emergent ethics of xenotransplantation: findings from a survey on public attitudes toward animal to human organ transplantation in the UK.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Is sport in the 'public interest'? Towards a legal and ethical framework for justifying sport-related harm.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Health Resource Allocation
    • Decision Theory

    Background:

    • Healthcare systems face challenges when patient demand for resources exceeds supply.
    • Ethical frameworks are crucial for equitable distribution of limited medical resources.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and refine a decision-making model for allocating scarce medical resources.
    • To integrate ethical considerations, including utilitarianism and deontological rights, into resource allocation.

    Main Methods:

    • Initial model development based on medical prognosis and life-threatening criteria.
    • Critical analysis of the initial model regarding value judgments and equal rights.
    • Modification of the model to incorporate both non-utilitarian (intrinsic worth) and utilitarian (consequences, irreplaceability) factors.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public HealthPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The initial model prioritizes medical prognosis and urgency.
    • Criticism highlights the need to consider societal or individual value beyond immediate medical need.
    • The revised model balances inherent human value with consequentialist considerations.

    Conclusions:

    • Resource allocation models must ethically balance objective medical criteria with broader societal and individual values.
    • A hybrid approach, incorporating both deontological rights and utilitarian considerations, offers a more robust ethical framework.
    • The concept of 'irreplaceability' can be a justifiable utilitarian factor in specific resource allocation scenarios.