Differences in the formation of poles of Enterococcus and Bacillus

The pole of Enterococcus hirae (Streptococcus faecium) is more pointed than that of Bacillus subtilis; i.e. the pole of the former is prolate and the latter is oblate. Both species form their poles by constructing annular additions on the inside surface. In both cases, the thick septum starts to split from the outside before the septum is complete. Physiochemical considerations dictate that the peptidoglycan must be unstretched as laid down. However, it later becomes stressed and may stretch to increase its surface area or to change its shape. Our earlier analysis for B. subtilis demonstrated that, without the addition of new peptidoglycan, the nascent wall is stretched after it is externalized to 1.51 times the original area. The wall of partially formed poles that is already exteriorized continues to deform with further development. For E. hirae, Higgins & Shockman's measurements showed that the completed pole has a surface area 2.18 times larger than a completed septal disk and the wall changes shape very little after exteriorization. A model is presented here for the streptococcus in which the septal wall does not increase its surface area on exteriorization either by expansion or by murein insertion. Instead, the septal wall as it is split and exteriorized twists to become oblique, increasing the inner radius of the incomplete septum. In consequence of this rotation, extra layers of peptidoglycan are added to the inside face of the developing septum. This additional murein forms the more pointed pole shape for E. hirae. This "split-and-splay" model thus refines and extends the surface stress theory of E. hirae developed a decade ago by proposing a source of the extra wall needed for the formation of its prolate, more pointed, pole.