Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Restoring endodontically treated teeth. Two different post systems.

B Godder¹, H E Strassler, T M Payne

¹Department of Operative Dentistry, New York University School of Dentistry.

The New York State Dental Journal

|April 1, 1992

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluation of a dentifrice containing 8% arginine, calcium carbonate, and sodium monofluorophosphate to prevent enamel loss after erosive challenges using an intra-oral erosion model.

The Journal of clinical dentistry·2014

Same author

Mechanisms underlying the manipulation of host apoptotic pathways by Toxoplasma gondii.

International journal for parasitology·2004

Same author

Periodontal splinting with a thin high-modulus polyethylene ribbon.

Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)·2002

Same author

Minimizing excessive composite resin when fabricating fiber-reinforced splints.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2000

Same author

Direct aesthetic bonding with a preformed facial matrix.

Dentistry today·2000

Same author

Repairing iatrogenic root perforations.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2000

Same journal

Oral Jewelry and Piercing: Risks to Health.

The New York state dental journal·2018

Same journal

Resective or Regenerative Periodontal Therapy: Considerations during Treatment Planning: A Case Report.

The New York state dental journal·2018

Same journal

Effect of Molding Technique on Iwo Physical Properties of Acrylic Resin Specimens.

The New York state dental journal·2018

Same journal

A Comparison of Three Camera Systems for Intraoral Photography.

The New York state dental journal·2018

Same journal

Eagle Syndrome: Case Report.

The New York state dental journal·2018

Same journal

Clinical and Radiographic Examination of Endoscopically Controlled Indirect Sinus Lift: An In vivo Study.

The New York state dental journal·2018

See all related articles

Restoring endodontically treated teeth presents significant challenges for dentists due to numerous material and technique options. Evaluating prefabricated post systems versus integral cast posts and cores is crucial for successful dental restoration.

Area of Science:

Restorative Dentistry
Endodontics
Dental Materials Science

Background:

Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is a complex clinical challenge.
Numerous prefabricated post systems (over 20) are available, complicating treatment decisions.
Options include various post designs, cements, core materials, pins, and posts.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the available options for restoring endodontically treated teeth.
To compare integral cast post and core versus prefabricated post systems.

Main Methods:

Literature review of current restorative materials and techniques.
Analysis of prefabricated post systems and integral cast post and core options.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

A wide array of prefabricated post systems exist, differing in design, cement, and core materials.
Integral cast post and core represents an alternative restorative approach.

Conclusions:

Clinicians face a broad spectrum of choices when restoring endodontically treated teeth.
The selection between integral cast post and core and prefabricated posts requires careful consideration of available materials and techniques.