Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Stigmatized targets and evaluation: prejudice as a determinant of attribute scrutiny and polarization
Monique A Fleming1, Richard E Petty, Paul H White
1Marketing, University of California-Los Angeles, Anderson School of Management, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. monique.fleming@anderson.ucla.edu
Abstract:
The authors provide evidence for a new mechanism for the more polarized evaluations of stigmatized than nonstigmatized target individuals that often follow positive versus negative target descriptions. The current research suggests that polarization can occur because low-prejudiced perceivers think more about information describing stigmatized than nonstigmatized targets (i.e., have polarized thoughts). Mediational path analyses revealed that polarized thoughts fully accounted for the impact of prejudice on evaluative polarization. These findings are most consistent with the watchdog hypothesis that people scrutinize information describing stigmatized targets in order to guard against possibly unfair reactions by themselves or others.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Stereotype Content Model
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Confirmation Biases
Halo Effect
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

