Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding prohibitions against genetic discrimination in insurance.

¹University of Virginia School of Law, USA.

Jurimetrics

|March 5, 2005

Summary

Laws prohibiting genetic discrimination in health insurance lack clear justification. While privacy and disease manifestation distinctions are insufficient, practical concerns may support these regulations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Enterprise medical liability and the choice of the responsible enterprise.

American journal of law & medicine·1994

Same author

Medical liability reform. A conceptual framework.

JAMA·1988

Same author

Observations on medical malpractice: insights from an in-depth study of medical malpractice case files.

Maryland state medical journal·1980

Same author

Replacement of the mitral valve through the left ventricle. A new approach.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·1971

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Health Law
Genetic Policy

Background:

Genetic discrimination in health insurance is a significant concern.
Existing laws aim to prevent unfair treatment based on genetic information.
The ethical and legal basis for these protections requires scrutiny.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the justifications for laws prohibiting genetic discrimination in health insurance.
To analyze whether privacy, insurance features, or disease manifestation distinctions support such laws.

Main Methods:

Legal and ethical analysis of existing arguments for genetic non-discrimination laws.
Examination of the principles of health insurance and privacy in the context of genetic information.

Main Results:

Privacy protection does not adequately justify laws against genetic discrimination.
Distinctive features of health insurance do not provide a clear rationale.
The distinction between presymptomatic genetic tendencies and manifested diseases is not a sufficient justification.

Conclusions:

The ethical and legal foundations for prohibiting genetic discrimination in health insurance are weak.
Practical considerations, rather than theoretical justifications, may be the primary basis for these laws.
Further examination of policy rationales is needed.

Keywords:

Genetics and Reproduction Legal Approach

Related Experiment Videos