Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assisted reproductive technologies on the Web.

Craig S Niederberger1

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA. craign@uic.edu

Fertility and Sterility
|March 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Journal of Urology Survey Abstracts: Craig Niederberger July.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

Evaluating Sperm DNA Damage: When and Why It Does Not Add to the Evaluation of Male Factor Infertility.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Male Infertility.

The Journal of urology·2025
Same author

Follicle-stimulating hormone treatment for male factor infertility.

Fertility and sterility·2022
Same author

Microsurgical varicocele ligation: surgical methodology and associated outcomes.

Fertility and sterility·2019
Same author

Re: Fertility Outcomes After Extended Searches for Ejaculated Spermatozoa in Men with Virtual Azoospermia.

European urology·2017
Same journal

Confronting complexities of uterus transplantation: Balancing Innovation, Risk and Access.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Fertility Benefits and Parental Leave Policies across Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Programs with Ob/Gyn Residency Programs.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Optimizing the therapeutic donor insemination cycle.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Hormonal and metabolic effects of the administration of oral low-dose 17-β-estradiol (0.2 mg) in patients with Functional Hypothalamic Amenorrhea (FHA): A Retrospective Pilot Study.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Biomarker or Bystander? Considering Triglyceride Glucose-Body Mass Index (TyG-BMI) in Patients with Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

The Importance of the Incubator: Perinatal Outcomes following Intravaginal Culture.

Fertility and sterility·2026
See all related articles

The quality of online health information varies greatly. A review of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology websites found significant room for improvement in meeting established health information guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Web Content Quality
  • Digital Health Communication

Background:

  • The proliferation of the World Wide Web has created challenges in delivering reliable health information globally.
  • Ensuring the quality and accuracy of online health content is crucial for public health.
  • Previous assessments of health-related websites highlight inconsistencies in information quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the quality of health care information on websites affiliated with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
  • To assess adherence to established guidelines for online health information.
  • To identify areas needing improvement in digital health communication within reproductive technology.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the American Medical Association (AMA) guidelines for evaluating health information.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducted a systematic review and report card assessment of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-affiliated websites.
  • Analyzed website content based on predefined quality criteria.

    • Main Results:

    • The report card revealed significant deficiencies in the quality of information presented on many Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology websites.
    • Websites demonstrated considerable room for improvement in adhering to American Medical Association standards.
    • Specific areas of weakness were identified in content accuracy, usability, and credibility.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a critical need to enhance the quality of online health information provided by reproductive technology organizations.
    • Adherence to established guidelines, such as those from the AMA, is essential for trustworthy online health resources.
    • Future efforts should focus on improving website content and ensuring compliance with quality standards to better serve a global audience.