Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Errors and risks in perioperative thrombolysis therapy].

F Spöhr1, B W Böttiger, A Walther

  • 1Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitätsklinikum, Heidelberg. Fabian.Spoehr@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Der Anaesthesist
|March 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeting CPR skills dissemination in schools and communities: the adapted Szpilman's mannikin and AED.

Resuscitation plus·2026
Same author

Barriers and facilitators while implementing community first responder systems in a western setting: mixed-methods expert consensus.

International journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Barriers and enablers to public access defibrillation - an international RAND-UCLA consensus study.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2026
Same author

[The new European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines 2025-Overview of the most important changes; the first 3-5 min are decisive].

Die Anaesthesiologie·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor: 250th cardiac arrest center certification in Germany.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2025
Same author

Kids and others save lives - All generations globally involved in World Restart a Heart 2024 to save the world!

Resuscitation plus·2025
Same journal

[Promoting young academics in anesthesiology: factors for an attractive internship].

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Respiratory support in COVID-19: all in due time!]

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Noninvasive respiratory support and invasive ventilation in COVID‑19 : Where do we stand today?]

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Management of acutely decompensated liver cirrhosis in emergency and critical care medicine].

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Anesthesia in patients with acute porphyria].

Der Anaesthesist·2022
Same journal

[Quality and safe anesthesia for all children : That is their right!]

Der Anaesthesist·2022
See all related articles

Perioperative thrombolysis, once contraindicated, is now shown to be a viable option for massive pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest. Decisions must be individualized, weighing bleeding risks against potential benefits, with rapid administration being key.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Anesthesiology
  • Critical Care Medicine

Context:

  • Historically, perioperative thrombolysis was contraindicated due to bleeding risks.
  • Recent case reports demonstrate successful perioperative thrombolytic therapy.
  • Emerging evidence challenges previous contraindications for thrombolysis during surgery.

Purpose:

  • To review the current evidence and indications for perioperative thrombolysis.
  • To highlight the potential benefits of thrombolysis in critical perioperative scenarios.
  • To emphasize the need for individualized treatment decisions in perioperative thrombolysis.

Summary:

  • Massive pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest are key indications for perioperative thrombolysis.
  • Thrombolysis can be life-saving when standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation fails.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The decision to use thrombolysis requires careful case-specific risk-benefit analysis.
  • No specific thrombolytic regimen has proven superior; rapid administration is suggested to minimize bleeding complications.

    • Impact:

    • Perioperative thrombolysis offers a critical therapeutic option in life-threatening situations.
    • Successful implementation can improve patient outcomes in emergency surgical care.
    • This approach necessitates a shift towards individualized patient management in critical care settings.