Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
The difficulty of coercion: a response to de Almeida
Martin J Pickering1, Brian McElree, Matthew J Traxler
1University of Edinburgh, UK. martin.pickering@ed.ac.uk
Abstract:
The sentence The secretary began the memo requires specifying what event the secretary began, because the memo does not refer to an event. McElree, Traxler, Pickering, Seely, and Jackendoff (2001) and Traxler, Pickering, and McElree (2002) found evidence from both self-paced reading and eye-tracking that such sentences caused processing difficulty, and thus argued that people "coerced" the object to refer to an event (e.g., writing the memo). de Almeida (2004) reports two self-paced reading experiments that failed to replicate some aspects of previous studies, and thereby argued against coercion during comprehension. A new experiment demonstrates coercion costs using new items, and provides evidence of coercion cost with de Almeida's stimuli. We conclude that coercion does cause processing difficulty.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Persuasion Strategies
Ethical Dilemmas II
The Response of Equilibria to the Conditions
Correspondence Bias

