Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Port-access aortic valve surgery: a technique in evolution.

Grayson H Wheatley1, Syma L Prince, Morley A Herbert

  • 1Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute, Dallas, Texas, USA.

The Heart Surgery Forum
|March 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term survival after multidisciplinary heart team-guided management of complex coronary artery disease.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2025
Same author

Mentoring the Ross Procedure in Adults Does Not Compromise Perioperative or Long-term Outcomes.

Annals of thoracic surgery short reports·2025
Same author

Assessment of TVT and STS Risk Score Performances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions·2024
Same author

Midterm durability of valve-sparing root replacement in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2024
Same author

Once and Again: Repeated Viewing Affects Judgments of Spontaneity and Preparation.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

Biases in Improvement Decisions: People Focus on the Relative Reduction in Bad Outcomes.

Psychological science·2024
Same journal

AKAP1 in Renal Patients with AHF to Reduce Ferroptosis of Cardiomyocyte.

The heart surgery forum·2024
Same journal

Cerebral Embolism and MINOCA Secondary to Left Atrial Myxoma after Occlusion of Atrial Septal Defect by Amplatzer Occluder: A Case Report.

The heart surgery forum·2024
Same journal

Working Around: The Use of AngioVac and Micra Transcatheter Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in a Critically Ill Patient Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

The heart surgery forum·2024
Same journal

Effects of Concomitant CABG on Outcomes in Veterans Who Require Surgery for Endocarditis.

The heart surgery forum·2024
Same journal

Effects of Short-Term Episodes of Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on the Long-term Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke.

The heart surgery forum·2024
Same journal

A Meta-Analysis for Postoperative Alternations of Aortic Coarctation.

The heart surgery forum·2024
See all related articles

Port-access aortic valve replacement (PAVR) offers a minimally invasive option for cardiac surgery. This approach leads to earlier extubation and shorter hospital stays compared to conventional methods, with similar safety outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
  • Aortic Valve Replacement

Background:

  • Minimally invasive surgical techniques are advancing cardiac disease treatment.
  • Port-access aortic valve replacement (PAVR) is one such innovative technique.
  • This study reviews the clinical experience with PAVR.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of port-access aortic valve replacement (PAVR).
  • To compare PAVR with conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) using sternotomy.
  • To assess patient recovery metrics and safety profiles.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 58 patients undergoing PAVR via minithoracotomy (Heartport System) from 1998-2002.
  • 1:1 matching with a cohort of patients who underwent conventional AVR with sternotomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data between the two groups.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant preoperative differences between PAVR and conventional AVR groups.
    • PAVR group showed significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp times.
    • PAVR patients experienced shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, with earlier extubation.
    • Mortality and morbidity rates were similar between the two surgical approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Port-access aortic valve surgery is an effective minimally invasive alternative.
    • PAVR facilitates earlier patient extubation and reduced hospital length of stay.
    • The data suggest a rapid surgeon learning curve for the PAVR technique.