Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Performance evaluation of image processing algorithms in CADe.

Michael A Wirth1

  • 1Department of Computing and Information Science, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada. mwirth@uoguelph.ca

Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
|March 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2026
Same author

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation to Lumbrical Muscles for Symptomatic Digital Stump Neuroma: Surgical Technique.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Three-Dimensional-Planned Patient-Specific Guides for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Primary and Revision Nonunion Cases.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

International orthopaedics·2018
Same author

Quality of internet-based decision aids for shoulder arthritis: what are patients reading?

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2018
Same author

Complications of Shoulder Arthroplasty.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2017
Same journal

Proteomics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Applications in Precision Medicine and Targeted Immunotherapy.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2026
Same journal

EML4-ALK in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Therapies.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2026
Same journal

Developing and Validating a Risk Model for Severe Bone Marrow Suppression in Esophageal Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2026
Same journal

A Novel Adjustable Tandem and Ring Applicator for Improved Dosimetry in Cervical Cancer HDR Brachytherapy.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2026
Same journal

Construction and Clinical Validation of a Colorectal Cancer OPISV Prognostic Model Integrating EPHB2 and ZNF346: Potential Regulatory Role of the Axon Guidance Pathway.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2026
Same journal

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Melanoma: A Systematic Review of Phase One Clinical Trials.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2026
See all related articles

Existing computer-aided detection (CADe) algorithms for breast cancer screening lack standardized evaluation. This study proposes a framework with standardized criteria to improve performance assessment for these crucial medical imaging algorithms.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Computer-Aided Diagnosis
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Image processing algorithms for computer-aided detection (CADe) in breast cancer screening are often developed and assessed without standardized methodologies.
  • This ad hoc approach limits the reliability and comparability of CADe system performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and characterize the limitations of current performance evaluation paradigms for image processing algorithms used in breast cancer screening CADe.
  • To propose a framework for establishing a robust performance evaluation process using standardized criteria.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of existing performance evaluation methods for CADe algorithms in breast cancer screening.
  • Development of a conceptual framework for standardized performance evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Existing evaluation methods for CADe algorithms are often ad hoc, lacking standardization.
  • A framework for standardized performance evaluation, addressing current shortcomings, has been presented.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized criteria are essential for reliable and comparable evaluation of image processing algorithms in breast cancer screening CADe.
  • Recommendations are provided to enhance the infrastructure for evaluating CADe algorithm performance.