Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predictors for Class II treatment duration.

Kurt Popowich1, Brian Nebbe, Giseon Heo

  • 1Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2N8.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
|March 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Predictors of orthodontic treatment duration for Class II malocclusions were identified. Key factors influencing treatment length include patient age, overjet, ANB angle, appliance type, and treatment details like elastic wear and appointment frequency.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-Frequency Ultrasound Compared to Periodontal Probing for Pocket Depth Assessment: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same author

Handheld point-of-care ultrasound for chairside assessment of masseter muscle: a pilot study.

Oral radiology·2026
Same author

Evaluating economic outcomes in the management of temporomandibular disorders: a protocol for a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Condylar volume changes in class II division 2 cases treated with unlocking the mandible using clear aligners.

Journal of the World federation of orthodontists·2025
Same author

Temporomandibular joint condylar/fossa positional changes after Herbst and Xbow treatments in adolescents assessed through cone-beam computed tomography imaging: A randomized controlled trial.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2025
Same author

Parent perspectives on effective patient-provider communication during orthodontic consultations: a qualitative description study.

The Angle orthodontist·2025

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dental Research
  • Clinical Dentistry

Background:

  • Class II malocclusions present complex treatment challenges.
  • Determining factors that influence treatment duration is crucial for efficient patient management.
  • Understanding predictors of treatment length can optimize orthodontic care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify clinical factors predicting treatment length in patients with Class II malocclusions.
  • To analyze variables influencing the duration of orthodontic treatment.
  • To establish a predictive model for Class II malocclusion treatment duration.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study analyzed data from 237 active retention patients across three observational groups.
  • Data collected included patient, model, pretreatment cephalometric, and treatment information.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two regression analyses were performed with total treatment time as the dependent variable.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant predictors for Class I and Class II patients included age, pretreatment overjet, and ANB angle.
    • For Class II treatment, appliance type, duration of appliance and elastic wear, maxillary expansion, debonds, and appointment frequency were significant.
    • Six variables collectively explained 56.7% of the variation in Class II treatment length.

    Conclusions:

    • Several clinical and treatment-related variables significantly predict Class II malocclusion treatment duration.
    • While identified factors explain a substantial portion of treatment time variance, further research is needed.
    • Optimizing treatment protocols based on these predictors may improve efficiency in managing Class II malocclusions.