Related Experiment Videos
Ethics, deafness, and new medical technologies.
Manfred Hintermair1, John A Albertini
1University of Education, Heidelberg.
Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
|March 22, 2005
Summary
New technologies improve deaf lives, but public focus on medical "cures" like cochlear implants overshadows other advancements. Professionals should adopt inclusive ethics for informed family decisions.
Area of Science:
- Sociology of Technology
- Disability Studies
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Technological advancements have significantly improved the lives of individuals within the Deaf community over the past 50 years.
- Public discourse and admiration are disproportionately centered on medical interventions, particularly cochlear implants, framing deafness as a problem to be solved.
- This focus stems from a societal preoccupation with viewing deafness as a disability and the allure of technological
- cures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the societal focus on medical technologies for deafness.
- To highlight the potential negative consequences of this narrow focus on families making critical decisions.
- To advocate for a shift towards inclusive and individualizing ethical practices among professionals interacting with Deaf individuals and their families.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of societal discourse surrounding deafness and technology.
- Review of ethical considerations in medical decision-making for Deaf individuals.
- Examination of the impact of information access on parental choices regarding deafness interventions.
Main Results:
- The current emphasis on medical solutions like cochlear implants overlooks the broader spectrum of technological benefits and community experiences.
- Families often face undue pressure and insufficient information, leading to unpreparedness for the long-term implications of their decisions.
- The societal perception of deafness as a disability needing a cure drives the demand for specific medical technologies.
Conclusions:
- A balanced perspective is needed, acknowledging both the benefits and limitations of medical technologies for deafness.
- Professionals must provide comprehensive information and support, respecting the autonomy of Deaf individuals and their families.
- Adopting inclusive and individualizing ethics is crucial for empowering families to make informed choices aligned with their values and aspirations.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health