Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026
07:31
Murine Drinking Models in the Development of Pharmacotherapies for Alcoholism: Drinking in the Dark and Two-bottle Choice
Published on: January 7, 2019
Methodology for estimation of days dry effects.
1Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA. mkuhn@aipl.arsusda.gov
Journal of Dairy Science
|March 22, 2005
Summary
Estimating the impact of days dry (DD) on milk yield is possible using field data. Appropriate statistical models, particularly those adjusting for cow effects and previous yield, provide unbiased results.
Area of Science:
- Dairy Science
- Animal Breeding and Genetics
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Days dry (DD) is a critical management factor influencing subsequent lactation milk yield in dairy cows.
- Accurate estimation of DD effects from field data is challenging due to potential confounding with cow-specific effects.
- Understanding these effects is crucial for optimizing herd management and genetic selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if unbiased estimates of days dry (DD) effects on subsequent lactation milk yield can be obtained from field data.
- To assess the impact of cow effects and previous lactation yield on DD effect estimation.
- To evaluate the sampling properties of designed trials for estimating DD effects.
Main Methods:
- Simulated dairy lactation records were used to test various statistical models.
- Models included no adjustment for cow effects, adjustment for previous lactation milk yield, adjustment for cow effects via an animal model, and a combination of these adjustments.
- The accuracy and bias of DD effect estimates were evaluated under different modeling scenarios.
Main Results:
- The unadjusted model produced biased (downward) estimates of DD effects.
- Alternative models, especially those incorporating prior adjustment for cow effects and previous milk yield, yielded essentially unbiased DD effect estimates.
- Designed trials require a minimum of 30 cows per group for informative results, with higher numbers improving statistical power.
Conclusions:
- Days dry (DD) effects on subsequent lactation milk yield can be reliably estimated from field data using appropriate statistical methodologies.
- Prior adjustment for cow effects and inclusion of previous lactation milk yield in the model are essential for unbiased estimation.
- Designed trials for DD effect estimation necessitate adequate sample sizes (minimum 30 cows/group) and consideration of prior data correction to enhance statistical power and accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
01:24One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
On...
01:20Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Pharmacodynamic methods provide insights into a drug's effects on physiological processes over time and play a crucial role in understanding bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. These methods can be broadly classified into acute pharmacological and therapeutic response approaches, each with distinct mechanisms and applications.The acute pharmacological response method directly correlates a drug's physiological effects, such as ECG or pupil diameter changes, to its time course in the body.