Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026
Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
Published on: November 14, 2018
Motion detection in normal infants and young patients with infantile esotropia
Rain G Bosworth1, Eileen E Birch
1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. robosworth@ucsd.edu
Insights
Infants develop a nasalward motion detection advantage around 3.5 months, which normalizes by 8 months. This motion detection asymmetry persists in infantile esotropia (ET) patients, suggesting abnormal binocular experience disrupts visual development.
Area of Science:
- Developmental neuroscience
- Ophthalmology
- Visual perception
Background:
- Infantile esotropia (ET) is a common childhood eye misalignment.
- Understanding visual development in infants is crucial for early diagnosis and intervention.
- Motion detection is a fundamental aspect of visual processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate horizontal motion detection asymmetries in normal infants and children.
- To compare motion detection in normal infants with that of infants diagnosed with infantile esotropia.
- To explore the developmental trajectory of motion perception and its potential disruption in ET.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a forced-choice preferential looking paradigm with random-dot patterns.
- Measured motion detection thresholds (% motion signal) in 75 normal infants and 27 infants with ET (aged 1 month to 5 years).
- Assessed sensitivity for nasalward (N) versus temporalward (T) motion directions.
Main Results:
- Normal infants showed equivalent N and T thresholds until 2.5 months, followed by a nasalward motion detection superiority from 3.5 to 6.5 months.
- This nasalward advantage in normal infants resolved to symmetrical performance by 8 months of age.
- Infants with ET exhibited a persistent nasalward superiority in motion detection, indicating impaired temporalward motion detection compared to nasalward detection, unlike normal infants.
Conclusions:
- A transient asymmetry in horizontal motion detection is a normal developmental finding in infants.
- Infantile esotropia is associated with a persistent deficit in temporalward motion detection.
- Abnormal binocular visual experience in infantile esotropia may underlie the disruption of motion processing mechanisms.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to investigate asymmetries in detection of horizontal motion in normal infants and children and in patients with infantile esotropia. Motion detection thresholds (% motion signal) were measured in 75 normal infants and in 36 eyes of 27 infants with infantile esotropia (ET), using a forced-choice preferential looking paradigm with random-dot patterns. Absolute motion detection sensitivity and asymmetries in sensitivity for nasalward (N) vs. temporalward (T) directions of motion were compared in normal and patient populations, ranging in age from 1 month to 5 years. In normal infants, N and T thresholds were equivalent under 2.5 months of age, whereas a superiority for monocular detection of N motion was observed between 3.5 and 6.5 months of age. The nasalward advantage gradually diminished to symmetrical T:N performance by 8 months of age, matching that of adults. No asymmetry was observed in 15 normal infants who performed the task binocularly, hence, the asymmetry was not a leftward/rightward bias. In the youngest infantile ET patients tested, at 5 months of age, a nasalward superiority in motion detection was observed and was equivalent to that of same-age normal infants. However, unlike normals, this asymmetry persists in older patients. This greater asymmetry in infantile ET represents worse detection of T than N motion. This is the first report of an asymmetry in motion detection in normal infants across a wide age range. Initially, motion detection is normal in infants with infantile esotropia. Cumulative abnormal binocular experience in these patients may disrupt motion mechanisms.
