Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A poultry-processing model for quantitative microbiological risk assessment.

Maarten Nauta1, Ine van der Fels-Klerx, Arie Havelaar

  • 1Microbiological Laboratory for Health Protection (MGB), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. maarten.nauta@rivm.nl

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|March 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) model for poultry processing, highlighting that inactivation/removal is key for high bacterial loads, while cross-contamination dominates for low loads. Nonlinear dynamics are crucial for accurate risk management.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 24: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2026.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Risk-benefit analysis of sampling plans in food processing facilities using the risk assessment framework.

International journal of food microbiology·2026
Same author

Microbiological safety of ungulates meat intended to be frozen and defrosting of frozen ungulates meat.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feeds as notified to EFSA.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 23: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2025.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2026
Same author

Investigating the Effect of Integrated Nutrition and Agricultural Training on Egg Production and Child Egg Consumption: A Secondary Analysis from the Un Oeuf Trial.

The Journal of nutrition·2025

Area of Science:

  • Food safety
  • Microbiology
  • Risk assessment

Background:

  • Campylobacter contamination in poultry processing is a significant public health concern.
  • Existing quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) models for poultry processing often simplify bacterial dynamics.
  • Understanding bacterial transfer and inactivation throughout processing is vital for effective control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a comprehensive QMRA model for campylobacter in poultry processing.
  • To analyze the dynamics of bacterial inactivation, removal, and cross-contamination during poultry processing.
  • To evaluate the realism of linear assumptions in existing models and the impact of nonlinear behavior on risk mitigation.

Main Methods:

  • Application of a consistent, stage-based model throughout industrial poultry processing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Modeling bacterial transfer from intestines to carcass, carcass to environment, and environment to carcass.
  • Incorporation of basic mechanistic insights to explore nonlinear bacterial dynamics.

    • Main Results:

    • Inactivation and removal effects are dominant for carcasses with high initial campylobacter loads.
    • Cross-contamination dynamics are more influential for carcasses with low initial bacterial loads.
    • Nonlinear bacterial behavior, not typically accounted for in QMRA, can impact risk mitigation predictions.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed QMRA model provides a more realistic representation of campylobacter dynamics in poultry processing.
    • Accurate risk management requires acknowledging nonlinear bacterial behavior and understanding variability in initial bacterial loads.
    • Arithmetic means are more suitable than geometric means for describing cross-contamination effects in QMRA.