Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves
Published on: October 17, 2013
Mechanical heart valve prostheses and persistent lupus anticoagulant: is the thrombotic risk increased?
Patricia Casais1, Susana S Meschengieser, Laura C Gennari
1Hemostasis and Thrombosis Department, Institute of Hematological Research, National Academy of Medicine, Buenos Aires, Argentina. casais@hematologia.anm.edu.ar
Insights
Patients with mechanical heart valves and lupus anticoagulant do not face increased embolism risk with standard anticoagulation. Adequate anticoagulation effectively prevents thrombosis without raising bleeding concerns.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hematology
- Thrombosis Research
Background:
- Mechanical heart valve prostheses carry a 1-2% annual risk of thrombosis despite anticoagulation.
- Lupus anticoagulant is frequently observed in patients experiencing recurrent thrombotic events.
- Current anticoagulation guidelines consider prosthesis type and patient comorbidities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate thrombotic events in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses and persistent lupus anticoagulant.
- To determine if lupus anticoagulant increases embolism risk in this population.
- To assess the need for intensified anticoagulation versus bleeding risk.
Main Methods:
- Ambispective case-control study design.
- Inclusion of 16 patients with mechanical heart valves and persistent lupus anticoagulant, and 16 matched controls.
- Over 80 patient-years of follow-up, accounting for other embolism risk factors.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in thromboembolic event rates between patients with lupus anticoagulant and controls.
- Thromboembolic events were not elevated even during high-risk periods like bacterial endocarditis.
- The study population maintained therapeutic anticoagulation levels for most of the follow-up duration.
Conclusions:
- Adequate anticoagulation is paramount for preventing thromboembolic events in mechanical heart valve patients.
- Persistent lupus anticoagulant does not appear to increase thrombotic risk when anticoagulation is maintained within the target range.
- Intensified anticoagulation is not necessarily indicated solely due to the presence of lupus anticoagulant, preserving a balance against bleeding complications.
Abstract:
The risk of thrombosis in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses in spite of life-long adequate anticoagulation is 1-2% per year. Current recommendations for anticoagulation take into account the prosthesis itself and the co-morbid conditions that enhance the thrombotic risk. Lupus anticoagulant is diagnosed in many thrombotic recurrences. We designed an ambispective case-control study to evaluate thrombotic events in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses and persistent lupus anticoagulant. Our objectives were to determine whether persistent lupus anticoagulant increased the risk of embolism in that population and thus, if a more intense anticoagulation would be recommended, even at the risk of increasing bleeding episodes. We included 16 patients and 16 controls with more than 80 patient-years of follow-up and with other risk factors for embolism. We observed no increased rate of thromboembolic events in patients than in controls, even during high-risk situations (i.e. bacterial endocarditis). Our population spent most of the time within the intended anticoagulation range. We conclude that adequate anticoagulation is the most important issue to prevent events, protecting against thrombosis without increasing the bleeding risk.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
