Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computational methods for transcriptional regulation.

Eric D Siggia1

  • 1Center for Studies in Physics and Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA. siggiae@rockefeller.edu

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
|March 31, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconstructing Waddington's landscape from data.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

A geometrical model of cell fate specification in the mouse blastocyst.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2024
Same author

A geometrical perspective on development.

Development, growth & differentiation·2023
Same author

Deep-learning analysis of micropattern-based organoids enables high-throughput drug screening of Huntington's disease models.

Cell reports methods·2022
Same author

Mechanisms underlying WNT-mediated priming of human embryonic stem cells.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2022
Same author

In vitro attachment and symmetry breaking of a human embryo model assembled from primed embryonic stem cells.

Cell stem cell·2022
Same journal

Transcription regulation of cell fate plasticity - from embryonic development to tissue regeneration.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Shared molecular and cellular programs during regeneration of glandular epithelia.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Lineage tracing in human cortical development.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Cis-regulatory strategies in developmental patterning.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

GABAergic neuron fate specification and lineage allocation: from development to disorder.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Active processes shape and move the genome and nucleoplasm.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
See all related articles

Integrating gene expression data, regulatory factor locations, and genome sequences presents challenges for understanding yeast regulatory networks. Computational methods offer insights but lack error quantification, highlighting the need for improved modeling approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Systems biology
  • Computational biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Understanding complex gene regulatory networks requires integrating diverse biological data, including gene expression, protein-DNA interactions, and genomic sequences.
  • Existing computational methods for inferring regulatory pathways from incomplete and noisy data often fail to quantify prediction errors.
  • Previous successes in computational prediction, such as in fly embryonic patterning, emphasize the importance of incorporating factor-specific DNA-binding preferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the challenge of integrating large-scale biological datasets for a comprehensive view of regulatory networks in budding yeast.
  • To explore computational strategies for modeling gene regulatory networks that account for data limitations and error quantification.
  • To investigate the utility of DNA-binding preferences in improving computational predictions of regulatory mechanisms.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of computational methods to integrate gene-expression array data, regulatory factor locations, and sequenced genomes.
  • Utilizing approaches that fit incomplete and noisy biological data to infer regulatory pathways.
  • Incorporating DNA-binding preferences of regulatory factors into computational models.

Main Results:

  • Computational methods can outline potential regulatory pathways but often do not quantify associated errors.
  • The study highlights that relying solely on conserved regulatory sequences across species may discard functional information.
  • DNA-binding preferences are crucial for accurate computational prediction of regulatory mechanisms, as demonstrated in model organisms.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating diverse genomic and functional data is essential for a global understanding of gene regulatory networks.
  • Accurate computational modeling of regulatory networks requires robust methods that quantify uncertainty and incorporate factor-specific properties.
  • Future research should focus on refining computational approaches to better capture the complexity of gene regulation, moving beyond simple sequence conservation.