Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

10.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
10.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.2K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.2K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.1K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.1K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

354
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
354
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

11.8K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
11.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Delegation to legitimate authority as a resource rational mechanism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Expectations of Reciprocal Generosity Are Specific to Equal Relationships.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Computational models of social cognition should incorporate social relationships as core primitives.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Precision fMRI reveals that the language network exhibits adult-like left-hemispheric lateralization by 4 years of age.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Children learn what is right or wrong selectively from a legitimate authority's punishment.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

The emergence of the language system in the toddler brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment
04:35

Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment

Published on: July 5, 2024

2.4K

Against simulation: the argument from error.

Rebecca Saxe1

  • 1Psychology Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Saxe@mit.edu

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|April 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Simulation Theory suggests using one's own mind to understand others. However, evidence from cognitive neuroscience and psychology contradicts this, particularly regarding errors in reasoning about others' minds.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Mitochondrial Morphology Through Simulation Supervised Learning
12:06

Analyzing Mitochondrial Morphology Through Simulation Supervised Learning

Published on: March 3, 2023

4.7K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment
04:35

Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment

Published on: July 5, 2024

2.4K
Analyzing Mitochondrial Morphology Through Simulation Supervised Learning
12:06

Analyzing Mitochondrial Morphology Through Simulation Supervised Learning

Published on: March 3, 2023

4.7K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Simulation Theory posits that observers model others' minds using their own.
  • Mirror neurons are proposed as a neural basis for this simulation mechanism.
  • This theory suggests a direct perception or 'resonance' with others' mental states.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present evidence against Simulation Theory.
  • To challenge the role of mirror neurons as the sole neural substrate for understanding others' minds.
  • To analyze cognitive and developmental data in relation to Simulation Theory.

Main Methods:

  • Review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience.
  • Analysis of findings from developmental psychology research.
  • Examination of data from social psychology studies.

Main Results:

  • Observed errors in adult and child reasoning about others' minds are inconsistent with Simulation Theory.
  • The 'resonance' model of Simulation Theory does not adequately explain these cognitive errors.
  • Evidence suggests alternative mechanisms for understanding other minds beyond direct simulation.

Conclusions:

  • Simulation Theory, particularly its 'resonance' aspect, is not supported by current psychological and neuroscientific evidence.
  • Mirror neuron systems may play a role, but not exclusively as proposed by Simulation Theory.
  • Further research is needed to explore alternative theories of mind perception.