Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic.

Thomas Nichols1, Matthew Brett, Jesper Andersson

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. nichols@umich.edu

Neuroimage
|April 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Replicability of multivariate brain-behaviour associations depends on clinical profile.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Effect sizes in human functional neuroimaging.

Research square·2026
Same author

ABCD-ReproNim: An educational program for responsible and reproducible analyses of ABCD data.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

The Hidden Landscape of Missed Effects in Human Functional Neuroimaging.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Open neuroinformatics infrastructure ecosystem for federated multisite studies.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Human brainstem activation underpinning offset analgesia changes in perceived pain intensity. An ultra-high field functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Neural Origins of Ear-EEG: A Correlation Study Using Scalp EEG Source Reconstruction.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Hysteresis effects in visual and auditory perception and the comparison of underlying neural mechanisms - an EEG study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Short-term audio-tactile training affects cortical auditory speech-envelope tracking for incongruent but not congruent stimuli.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Dissociable Neurocognitive Mechanisms of State and Trait Anxiety in Working Memory: Threat-Induced Alterations in Decision Dynamics and Attenuation of Large-Scale Network Reconfiguration.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neuro-Ocular Amyloid Characterization in Alzheimer's Disease via Cross-Site PET-MRI and Hierarchical Cross-Attention Driven Multimodal Representation Learning.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Whole-brain network dynamics underlying intolerance of uncertainty.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

The minimum statistic compared to the global null (MS/GN) test is widely used for conjunctions in neuroimaging but is often misinterpreted. A correct logical AND test requires individual significance for all comparisons, not the MS/GN method.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Conjunctions in logic represent an AND relationship between truth statements.
  • In neuroimaging, conjunctions are used to identify brain areas activated by multiple tasks simultaneously.
  • The minimum statistic compared to the global null (MS/GN) test, implemented in SPM software, is a common but potentially flawed method for conjunction analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the minimum statistic compared to the global null (MS/GN) test for logical AND conjunctions in neuroimaging.
  • To highlight the misinterpretation and confusion surrounding the MS/GN test in the neuroimaging community.
  • To propose a correct statistical approach for conjunction inference in brain activation studies.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review and definition of logical conjunctions.
  • Analysis of the null hypothesis of the MS/GN test.
  • Survey of current practices in neuroimaging conjunction analysis.
  • Development and presentation of a revised statistical test for logical AND conjunctions.

Main Results:

  • The MS/GN test does not possess the correct null hypothesis for a logical AND.
  • A survey reveals widespread misinterpretation of the MS/GN test as evidence for a logical AND.
  • A correct logical AND test necessitates individual significance for all constituent comparisons, irrespective of independence.

Conclusions:

  • The MS/GN test is inappropriate for testing logical AND conjunctions in neuroimaging.
  • A revised statistical approach ensuring individual significance for each comparison is recommended for accurate conjunction inference.
  • Clarifying the statistical basis of conjunction analysis is crucial for reducing confusion in neuroimaging research.