Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

10:58
A Procedure for Implanting Organized Arrays of Microwires for Single-unit Recordings in Awake, Behaving Animals
Published on: February 14, 2014
Pronominal reference in sentences about persons or things: an electrophysiological approach
Anke Hammer1, Bernadette M Jansma, Monique Lamers
1Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|April 7, 2005
Summary
German pronoun resolution involves both syntactic and semantic processing. Syntactic integration is key for both people and things, but semantic factors play a larger role when referring to people.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Neuroscience
- Computational Linguistics
Background:
- German pronoun resolution depends on biological/syntactic gender for persons and syntactic gender for things.
- Understanding pronoun-antecedent co-reference requires integrating linguistic information.
- Event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically the P600 and N400, offer insights into cognitive processes during language comprehension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the roles of semantic and syntactic integration in German pronoun resolution.
- To differentiate the neural correlates of processing pronouns referring to persons versus things.
- To examine the temporal dynamics of co-reference establishment using ERPs.
Main Methods:
- Participants processed sentences with antecedents (persons or things) followed by pronouns.
- Experimental conditions manipulated gender agreement (biological/syntactic for persons, syntactic for things).
- Electroencephalography (EEG) recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) focusing on P600 and N400 components.
Main Results:
- A P600 effect, indicative of syntactic reanalysis, was observed for gender-mismatched pronouns in both person and thing conditions.
- The P600 effect was larger for persons than for things, suggesting greater sensitivity to gender congruence.
- An N400 effect, related to semantic integration, occurred after the pronoun in the thing condition but not the person condition.
Conclusions:
- Syntactic integration is crucial for pronoun resolution, influenced by antecedent type (person vs. thing).
- Semantic and syntactic information jointly guide pronoun processing for persons.
- Integration processes for persons conclude at the pronoun, while for things, they continue to subsequent words.

