Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Learning disabilities in children with very low birthweight: prevalence, neuropsychological correlates, and
Jonathan Litt1, H Gerry Taylor, Nancy Klein
1Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Insights
Children with extremely low birthweight (<750g) face higher risks for learning disabilities (LD) and cognitive issues. Early identification and support are crucial for these vulnerable children.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Neuropsychology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Children born with very low birthweight (<1500g) may experience developmental challenges.
- Specific learning disabilities (LD) can impact academic and cognitive outcomes.
- Understanding the long-term effects of extreme prematurity is essential for targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare achievement, neuropsychological, and intervention outcomes in very low birthweight (VLBW) children versus term-born controls.
- To assess the prevalence and correlates of specific learning disabilities (LD) in VLBW children without neurosensory disorders.
- To identify cognitive deficiencies and learning problems in extremely low birthweight (ELBW) survivors.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal study comparing children with <750g birthweight (n=31), 750-1499g birthweight (n=41), and term-born controls (n=52).
- Assessment of achievement (math), IQ, and neuropsychological skills (perceptual-organizational) at mean age 11 years.
- Analysis of learning disability (LD) rates and special education/remedial assistance utilization.
Main Results:
- The <750g birthweight group scored significantly lower in math, IQ, and perceptual-organizational skills compared to term-born controls.
- Children with <750g birthweight exhibited higher rates of past and present specific learning disabilities (LD).
- No significant differences were found in special education or remedial assistance rates between groups.
Conclusions:
- Children with extremely low birthweight (<750g), even without major impairments, are at increased risk for LD and cognitive deficits.
- Current identification and support systems may not adequately address the learning needs of ELBW children.
- Further research and improved interventions are necessary to support learning outcomes in this high-risk population.
Abstract:
This study examined achievement, neuropsychological, and intervention outcomes at a mean age of 11 years in children with very low birthweight (VLBW, <1500 g) compared with a term-born control group. To assess the prevalence and correlates of specific learning disabilities (LD), the sample was limited to children without neurosensory disorders who had at least low average IQ. Participants included 31 children with <750 g birthweight, 41 with 750-1499 g birthweight, and 52 controls. The <750 g group obtained lower scores in math, IQ, and perceptual-organizational skills than the term-born group. The < 750 g group also had higher rates of past and present LD than the controls. Despite these differences, the groups did not differ significantly in rates of special education or tutorial/remedial assistance. These findings suggest that children with extremely low birthweight without gross physical or intellectual impairments are at higher risk for LD and cognitive deficiencies than their term-born peers and that further efforts are needed to improve identification and treatment of these learning problems.
Related Concept Videos
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Language and Cognition
Intellectual Disability
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Information Processing Approach
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings.

