Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Investigation into Deep Breathing through Measurement of Ventilatory Parameters and Observation of Breathing Patterns
Published on: September 16, 2019
Tidal breathing analysis in school-age children. Comparison with the parameters of forced expiration
Stefan S Kostianev1, Blagoy I Marinov, Nelly B Gencova
1Department of Pathophysiology, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Insights
Tidal breathing parameters (TBP) show high variability in children, limiting their use for diagnosing airflow obstruction (AFO). While useful for monitoring asthma, they cannot replace forced expiration tests for detecting overt AFO.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Respiratory Physiology
- Diagnostic Methods in Pediatrics
Background:
- Tidal breathing analysis (TBA) shows potential for monitoring airflow obstruction (AFO) in pediatric and critically ill populations.
- Understanding tidal breathing parameters (TBP) in healthy and asthmatic children is crucial for evaluating respiratory function.
- Comparison with forced expiration parameters is needed to establish TBA's clinical utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze tidal breathing parameters (TBP) in healthy and asthmatic school-age children.
- To compare TBP with forced expiration parameters in the same age groups.
- To assess the diagnostic capability of TBP for airflow obstruction.
Main Methods:
- Study included 225 healthy children and 100 asthmatic children aged 7–14 years.
- Analysis of tidal breathing parameters (TBP) including V(PTEF)/V(E) and T(PTEF)/T(E).
- Comparison of TBP with forced expiration parameters and assessment using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.
Main Results:
- Tidal breathing parameters (TBP) exhibited significant inter- and intraindividual variability, even with averaged data.
- Indices reflecting tidal expiratory flow (V(PTEF)/V(E), T(PTEF)/T(E)) showed high variability and no correlation with age or anthropometrics in healthy children.
- These indices detected acute changes in asthmatic children and discriminated between subjects with and without airflow obstruction (AFO), but with weak discriminative capacity compared to FEV1.
Conclusions:
- Tidal breathing parameters (TBP) offer supplementary insights into respiratory function but do not substitute forced expiration for detecting overt airflow obstruction in school-aged children.
- The high variability of TBP necessitates careful interpretation in clinical settings.
- Further research may explore refined methods for utilizing TBP in pediatric respiratory assessments.
Unlabelled:
Tidal breathing analysis is a method which has the potential to be used for distinguishing and follow-up of airflow obstruction (AFO) in infants, children and critically ill patients. The aim of the present study was to analyse the tidal breathing parameters (TBP) in healthy and in asthmatic school-age children and to compare them with the parameters of forced expiration.
Subjects:
Two hundred and twenty five healthy children and 100 asthmatics (7 to 14 years- old) took part in the present study.
Results:
The results show that TBPs exhibit great inter- and intraindividual variability, even if the mean value of 10 consecutive breathing cycles is used. Parameters that reflect the tidal expiratory flow pattern--V(PTEF)/V(E) and T(PTEF)/T(E) demonstrate high variability and no correlation with age, sex and anthropometric parameters in healthy children. These indices are useful for detection of acute changes in bronchomotor tonus in asthmatics - V(PTEF)/V(E) = 36.1 +/- 6.6% vs. 32.6 +/- 6.2% (methacholine) vs. 37.4 +/- 7.5% (salbutamol) and T(PTEF)/T(E) = 34.2 +/- 6.2% vs. 28.6 +/- 7.8% vs. 35.3 +/- 7.5%, resp. (P < 0.05 everywhere; n = 34) as well as for discriminating a group of subjects with AFO vs. controls (V(PTEF)/V(E) = 30.9 +/- 6.5% vs. 35.3 +/- 8.0%; P = 0.005, and T(PTEF)/T(E) = 29.0 +/- 6.7% vs. 32.8 +/- 7.6%; P = 0.016). The evaluation of the area under the ROC curves (AUC) in the asthmatic group showed weak discriminative capacity of T(PTEF)/T(E) and V(PTEF)/V(E) in comparison to FEV1 (AUC of T(PTEF)/T(E) = 0.62; 95%CI 0.51-0.74).
Conclusions:
Tidal breathing parameters could add insight t.o the functional profile but are not capable of substituting forced expiration regarding detection of overt airflow obstruction in school-age children.
Related Concept Videos
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration can...
Breathing
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
Pulmonary Cycle: Exhalation
Alterations in Respiration II
In Biot's breathing, the respiratory rate and depth are irregular, alternating between periods of deep gasping and apnea. Common causes include...
