Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Central processing overlap modulates P3 latency.

R Dell'acqua1, P Jolicoeur, F Vespignani

  • 1Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. dar@unipd.it

Experimental Brain Research
|April 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antibacterial prophylaxis and antimicrobial stewardship in the era of innovative therapies for haematological malignancies: transplantation, cellular therapies and new drugs.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2026
Same author

Impact of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) on adult haematology oncology patients.

The Journal of infection·2024
Same author

Multishell Diffusion MRI-Based Tractography of the Facial Nerve in Vestibular Schwannoma.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020
Same author

N2pc reflects two modes for coding the number of visual targets.

Psychophysiology·2018
Same author

Impact of video games on plasticity of the hippocampus.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

HCV and diabetes: towards a 'sustained' glycaemic improvement after treatment with DAAs?

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2016
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Investigating the P3 component, this study found that its latency, not amplitude, correlates with the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect. Central mechanisms likely influence P3 latency variations during dual-task processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • The P3 component is a key event-related potential (ERP) reflecting cognitive processing.
  • Understanding the functional mechanisms modulating P3 latency is crucial for cognitive neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the functional mechanisms influencing P3 latency.
  • To determine if P3 amplitude or latency correlates with the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1 utilized a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm with varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) and measured T(2)-locked P3 latency and amplitude.
  • Experiment 2 measured P3 under single-task conditions for comparison.
  • Reaction times and P3 parameters were analyzed in relation to SOA and task conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A significant lengthening of reaction time to the second stimulus (T(2)) was observed as SOA decreased (PRP effect).
  • T(2)-locked P3 latency increased as SOA decreased, showing a positive correlation with the PRP effect across subjects.
  • No significant SOA-dependent P3 amplitude variation was found in Experiment 1.
  • P3 amplitude was higher in single-task than dual-task conditions, with no SOA-dependent latency variations in Experiment 2.

Conclusions:

  • P3 activity processing occurs at or after the locus of the PRP effect.
  • Central mechanisms are strongly implicated in P3 latency variations.
  • P3 latency, rather than amplitude, is a sensitive indicator of processing limitations within the PRP paradigm.