Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does selective attention influence the octave illusion?

Christopher D Chambers1, Jason B Mattingley, Simon A Moss

  • 1Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. c.chambers@psych.unimelb.edu.au

Perception
|April 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trajectory classes of post-stroke depression severity and their baseline predictors: A multi-cohort replication study.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Functional neurological symptoms occur commonly in healthy adults: implications for the pathophysiology of FND.

CNS spectrums·2026
Same author

Inverted encoding of neural responses to audiovisual stimuli reveals super-additive multisensory enhancement.

eLife·2026
Same author

A pilot safety and tolerability study of scanning ultrasound as a neuromodulation therapy in Alzheimer's disease.

Brain communications·2025
Same author

Expectation dynamically modulates the representational time course of objects and locations.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Goal-directed modulation of neural activity during working memory maintenance.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated the octave illusion, finding no link between selective attention and sequential interactions. These results challenge the suppression model

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Cognitive psychology

Background:

  • The octave illusion involves alternating tones presented to each ear, perceived as alternating pitches in opposite ears.
  • The suppression model suggests pitch perception depends on ear dominance and location on high-frequency dominance.
  • Sequential interactions were proposed to facilitate this 'what' and 'where' processing, but recent studies cast doubt.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-examine the role of sequential interactions in the octave illusion.
  • To investigate whether selective attention influences sequential interactions, potentially explaining previous null findings.
  • To test the validity of the suppression model in light of new evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Participants listened to octave illusion-inducing tone sequences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Selective attention was manipulated or controlled for.
  • Listener reports of pitch perception and location were analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant evidence was found linking selective attention to sequential interactions in the octave illusion.
    • The results did not support a role for sequential interactions as previously proposed.
    • Previous null findings regarding sequential interactions were not attributable to uncontrolled attention.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings consolidate doubts about the validity of the suppression model of the octave illusion.
    • Selective attention does not appear to mediate the effect of sequential interactions.
    • Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the octave illusion.