Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Feature representations and analytic/nonanalytic processing.

Samuel Hannah1

  • 1Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. hannahsd@mcmaster.ca

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale
|April 19, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Instance theory distinguishes feature representations, impacting decision-making and categorization. Recent studies suggest a nuanced view, refining the analytic/nonanalytic processing distinction for better understanding cognitive processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural temporal dynamics of contingency judgement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2010
Same author

The sad truth about depressive realism.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2007
Same author

The consequences of surrendering a degree of freedom to the participant in a contingency assessment task.

Behavioural processes·2006
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Instance theory, originally proposed by Lee Brooks, differentiates analytic and nonanalytic processing.
  • Brooks' recent work highlights two feature representation types: specific appearance and abstract information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent studies examining the link between feature representation types and cognitive processes.
  • To investigate how different feature representations influence decision-making and categorization behavior.
  • To propose a refined distinction between analytic and nonanalytic processing based on feature representation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent empirical studies.
  • Analysis of decision-making processes.
  • Examination of categorization behavior patterns.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Reliance on specific feature representations is linked to distinct decision-making patterns.
  • Abstract feature representations correlate with different categorization behaviors.
  • The findings complicate the traditional analytic/nonanalytic processing distinction.

Conclusions:

  • Feature representation type significantly influences cognitive processes.
  • A more precise reformulation of the analytic/nonanalytic distinction is necessary.
  • Understanding feature representation is key to understanding decision-making and categorization.