Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

All thumbs?

Federico Sanabria1, Peter R Killeen

  • 1Department of Psychology, Box 871104, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA. federico.sanabria@asu,edu

Behavioural Processes
|April 23, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study explores rules of thumb (RoT), examining their learning, function, and context-dependent simplicity. Operant and respondent conditioning theories offer a framework to better understand these cognitive shortcuts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What is possible and what is worth: Higher levers afford more work and enhance the value of leisure.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same author

Individual versus collective associative learning in ants.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Twiddling Bits.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same author

Testing an increasing social working memory load in the female rat.

Brain research·2025
Same author

Spatially extended instrumental responses are organized in functional bouts.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025
Same author

An Exploration of Individual and Collective Reversal Learning in Rats.

Perspectives on behavior science·2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Rules of thumb (RoT) are cognitive heuristics simplifying complex decisions.
  • Current understanding of RoT evolution, function, and learning remains incomplete.
  • The apparent simplicity of RoT is influenced by embodiment and context.

Discussion:

  • Operant conditioning provides a framework for understanding RoT selection and reinforcement.
  • Respondent conditioning offers insights into the associative learning underlying RoT.
  • Integrating these conditioning theories can elucidate RoT development and application.

Key Insights:

  • RoT are not static but evolve through learning and environmental interaction.
  • Task-specific selection of RoT is influenced by reinforcement histories.
  • Embodiment and context critically shape the perceived simplicity and efficacy of RoT.

Outlook:

  • Further research should integrate conditioning principles to model RoT dynamics.
  • Investigating RoT in diverse tasks and contexts will reveal broader functional principles.
  • This framework can advance understanding of adaptive decision-making and learning.

Related Experiment Videos