Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Cost-effectiveness of iodixanol in patients at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy
Peter Aspelin1, Pierre Aubry, Sven-Göran Fransson
1Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden. peter.aspelin@cfss.ki.se
Insights
Iodixanol, an isosmolar contrast medium, is more cost-effective than iohexol for patients undergoing angiography. This is due to fewer adverse events, including acute renal failure, leading to lower treatment costs.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Radiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a significant complication of iodine-based contrast media.
- CIN leads to acute renal failure, posing clinical and economic burdens.
- Investigating cost-effectiveness of different contrast media for high-risk patients is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost and cost-effectiveness of iodixanol versus iohexol in patients at high risk for CIN.
- To evaluate the nephrotoxic effects and associated costs of two contrast media.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, prospective, multinational clinical study compared iodixanol and iohexol.
- Resource utilization data were collected from the study and patient records.
- Swedish, German, and French unit prices were used for cost analysis.
Main Results:
- Fewer serious adverse reactions, including acute renal failure, occurred with iodixanol compared to iohexol.
- Mean hospitalization costs were lower with iodixanol across all analyzed unit prices.
- Treatment costs for adverse drug reactions were significantly lower for iodixanol (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- Isosmolar iodixanol is cost-effective compared to low-osmolar iohexol for diabetic patients with renal impairment undergoing angiography.
- Iodixanol demonstrated both lower costs and better clinical outcomes (fewer adverse events).
- This suggests iodixanol as a preferred agent for high-risk patients to mitigate CIN complications and costs.
Background:
Acute renal failure after contrast-induced nephropathy is a clinically important and costly complication after the use of iodine-based contrast media. We investigated the cost and cost-effectiveness of 2 contrast media in patients at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.
Methods:
The analyses were based on a randomized, prospective, multinational clinical study comparing the nephrotoxic effects of an isosmolar nonionic contrast medium, iodixanol, with those of a low-osmolar nonionic contrast medium, iohexol. Resource utilization data were obtained from the study and from a retrospective review of patients' hospital records. Swedish, German, and French unit prices were applied to resources used. Between-group differences in average costs were analyzed using a nonparametric bootstrap method.
Results:
Resource utilization data for 125 patients were analyzed. Seven contrast media-related serious adverse reactions, of which 6 were acute renal failures, were noted in 6 patients receiving iohexol. Two patients in the iodixanol group had 1 nonserious reaction each. The mean hospitalization cost per patient was Euros 489, Euros 573, and Euros 393 lower after iodixanol than after iohexol using Swedish, German, and French unit prices, respectively. The mean per-patient costs of treating adverse drug reactions were Euros 371, Euros 399, and Euros 445 lower after iodixanol than after iohexol, using the respective unit prices (P < or = 0.01). Iodixanol was cost-effective compared with iohexol, with both lower costs and better effects related to fewer adverse drug reactions.
Conclusions:
The isosmolar contrast medium iodixanol appears to be cost-effective when compared with a low-osmolar contrast medium, iohexol, in diabetic patients with renal impairment undergoing angiography.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Renal Failure: Dose Adjustments
Reduced renal clearance and elimination rate are common outcomes of renal impairment. These alterations lead to a prolonged elimination half-life and an altered apparent volume of distribution for drugs. As a result, dosage adjustments are typically necessary to maintain optimal drug levels in the body.
However, dosage adjustments...
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
