Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Flexibility of spatial averaging in visual perception.

Tania Lombrozo1, Jeff Judson, Donald I A MacLeod

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA. lombrozo@wjh.harvard.edu

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|May 5, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine understanding.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Judgments of Responsibility for Inequality: A Framework and Review.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

How beliefs persist amid controversy: The paths to persistence model.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

How laypeople evaluate scientific explanations containing jargon.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Evidence for multiple kinds of belief in theory of mind.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Is Ockham's razor losing its edge? New perspectives on the principle of model parsimony.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Human visual perception of contrast is flexible, not fixed. Spatial averaging in contrast perception changes with stimulus contrast, suggesting dynamic receptive fields (RFs) in the brain.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Computational Vision

Background:

  • The classical receptive field (RF) model posits that visual neurons respond to fixed stimulus properties.
  • Recent physiological studies challenge this fixed RF concept, indicating greater flexibility in neural responses.
  • Extending these findings to human vision is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the flexibility of spatial averaging in human contrast perception.
  • To determine how stimulus contrast and uniformity influence spatial averaging.
  • To explore the underlying neural mechanisms, including potential dynamic receptive fields.

Main Methods:

  • Human psychophysical experiments measuring contrast perception.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic variation of stimulus contrast and uniformity.
  • Analysis of spatial averaging extent based on perceptual performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Spatial averaging in contrast perception is not fixed but is highly flexible.
    • At low contrast, significant spatial averaging (approx. 11 min of arc) occurs, especially in uniform regions.
    • At high contrast, spatial averaging is minimal, preserving finer details.

    Conclusions:

    • The visual system balances noise reduction (favoring large averaging) and detail preservation (favoring minimal averaging).
    • Findings support either two distinct neuronal populations with fixed RFs or, more intriguingly, dynamic, contrast-dependent RFs.
    • This flexibility in spatial averaging is a key feature of human contrast perception.