Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis
1Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, Shelleys Cottage, University of Liverpool, Merseyside, UK. c.gamble@liverpool.ac.uk
Background:
Most systematic reviewers aim to perform an intention-to-treat meta-analysis, including all randomized participants from each trial. This is not straightforward in practice: reviewers must decide how to handle missing outcome data in the contributing trials.
Objective:
To investigate methods of allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in a meta-analysis.
Study Design And Setting:
The Cochrane Library was surveyed to assess current use of imputation methods. We developed a methodology for incorporating uncertainty, with weights assigned to trials based on uncertainty interval widths. The uncertainty interval for a trial incorporates both sampling error and the potential impact of missing data. We evaluated the performance of this method using simulated data.
Results:
The survey showed that complete-case analysis is commonly considered alongside best-worst case analysis. Best-worst case analysis gives an interval for the treatment effect that includes all of the uncertainty due to missing data. Unless there are few missing data, this interval is very wide. Simulations show that the uncertainty method consistently has better power and narrower interval widths than best-worst case analysis.
Conclusion:
The uncertainty method performs consistently better than best-worst case imputation and should be considered along with complete-case analysis whenever missing data are a concern.
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Uncertainty: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
