Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Uncertainty method improved on best-worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis.

Carrol Gamble1, Sally Hollis

  • 1Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, Shelleys Cottage, University of Liverpool, Merseyside, UK. c.gamble@liverpool.ac.uk

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|May 10, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endotracheal surfactant for infants with life-threatening bronchiolitis (BESS): a randomised, blinded, sham-controlled, phase 2 trial.

The Lancet. Respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

Clinical and health economic impact of the BASICS trial on ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: UK Shunt Registry analysis.

Journal of neurosurgery·2026
Same author

A Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Maternal Infection Outcomes.

The New England journal of medicine·2025
Same author

The COMBAT Project: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set for morbidity following surgery in paediatric brain tumour patients.

Trials·2025
Same author

Frailty increases the risk of hospitalization for atrial fibrillation in older adults: a population-based cohort study.

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD·2025
Same author

Carboprost versus Oxytocin as the first-line treatment of primary postpartum haemorrhage (COPE): protocol for a phase IV, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial and economic analysis.

BMJ open·2025
Same journal

Harms Reporting Was Frequently Incomplete or Discordant in Biomedical Randomized Trials Published in 2023: A Meta-epidemiological Study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Using an Open Science Checklist in Grant Proposal Reviews to Predict Reproducibility of Funded Publications.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Handling missing data in meta-analysis is crucial. A new uncertainty method offers better power and narrower intervals than best-worst case analysis for handling missing outcome data.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Systematic Reviews

Background:

  • Systematic reviews often aim for intention-to-treat meta-analyses, including all randomized participants.
  • Handling missing outcome data in trials presents a practical challenge for meta-analysis.
  • Current methods for addressing missing data in meta-analyses require careful consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate methods for incorporating uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analyses.
  • To evaluate the performance of a novel uncertainty method for handling missing data.

Main Methods:

  • A survey of the Cochrane Library assessed current imputation methods.
  • A new methodology was developed to incorporate uncertainty, weighting trials by uncertainty interval widths.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The uncertainty interval accounts for sampling error and potential impact of missing data.
  • Simulations were used to evaluate the performance of the developed method.

    • Main Results:

    • Complete-case and best-worst case analyses are commonly used.
    • Best-worst case analysis yields very wide intervals for treatment effects when data are missing.
    • The developed uncertainty method demonstrated superior power and narrower interval widths compared to best-worst case analysis in simulations.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel uncertainty method outperforms best-worst case imputation.
    • The uncertainty method should be considered alongside complete-case analysis for meta-analyses with missing data.
    • This approach enhances the reliability of meta-analysis results when dealing with missing outcome data.