Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hydroxyapatite coating on carbon composite hip implants in dogs.

G L Maistrelli1, N Mahomed, D Garbuz

  • 1Toronto East General and Orthopaedic Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume
|May 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

This study compared three types of hip implants in 33 dogs: carbon composite with hydroxyapatite coating, uncoated carbon composite, and titanium alloy with porous coating. The goal was to assess how well each implant integrated with bone and how strong the bond was. Results showed that hydroxyapatite-coated implants had much better osseointegration than uncoated ones, with a six-fold increase in strength and twelve-fold increase in stiffness. Titanium alloy implants had the strongest bond but showed more bone resorption. The findings suggest that hydroxyapatite coatings could improve implant performance in veterinary orthopedics.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Genome-wide transcriptional effects of deletions of sulphur metabolism genes in Drosophila melanogaster" [Redox Biol. 36 (2020) 101654].

Redox biology·2024
Same author

A tool for evaluating novel osteoarthritis therapies using multivariate analyses of human cartilage-synovium explant co-culture.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2021
Same author

Genome-wide transcriptional effects of deletions of sulphur metabolism genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Redox biology·2020
Same author

Imaging and clinical features of breast tuberculosis: a review series of 62 cases.

Clinical radiology·2020
Same author

Age-dependent expression profiles of two adaptogenic systems and thermotolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Cell stress & chaperones·2020
Same author

The importance of perceived helplessness and emotional health in understanding the relationship among pain, function, and satisfaction following revision knee replacement surgery.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2013

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic implant materials
  • Veterinary surgical outcomes
  • Biomechanical testing in orthopedics

Background:

Current research in orthopedic implant design focuses on improving osseointegration and mechanical stability. Established knowledge shows that porous titanium alloys support bone ingrowth, but long-term outcomes remain uncertain. This gap motivated investigations into alternative materials like carbon composites. No prior work had resolved the comparative performance of hydroxyapatite coatings on such composites. Researchers have shown that hydroxyapatite enhances bone-implant bonding in controlled settings. However, real-world application in large animals remains limited. This study aimed to address these uncertainties in a canine model. The findings may clarify the role of hydroxyapatite coatings in orthopedic implant success.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to compare osseointegration and mechanical stability of carbon composite femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coatings. It also evaluated titanium alloy implants with porous coatings as a benchmark. The problem addressed is the need for durable, well-integrated implants in veterinary orthopedics. The motivation stems from the limitations of current materials in achieving long-term stability. Researchers sought to determine if hydroxyapatite could enhance performance in this context. The canine model was selected for its anatomical similarity to human hips. The study focused on interface shear strength and stiffness as key metrics. These outcomes could inform material choices for future implant designs.

Keywords:
hydroxyapatite coatingscarbon composite implantsosseointegrationorthopedic implant testing

Frequently Asked Questions

The hydroxyapatite-coated implants showed a six-fold increase in interface shear strength and twelve-fold increase in shear stiffness compared to uncoated ones.

Push-out tests measured interface shear strength and stiffness to evaluate osseointegration in the canine model.

Titanium alloy implants with porous coatings served as a benchmark, showing the highest shear strength but more resorptive bone remodeling.

Osseointegration was assessed using radiographic and histological methods, with statistical comparisons between implant groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study involved 33 dogs divided into three implant groups. One group received carbon composite stems with hydroxyapatite coatings. Another group had uncoated carbon composite stems. The third group received titanium alloy stems with porous coatings. Osseointegration was assessed using standard radiographic and histological methods. Push-out tests measured interface shear strength and stiffness at 7.2 months post-implantation. Data collection included mechanical testing and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical comparisons were made between the three groups. The study design allowed for direct comparisons of mechanical and biological outcomes.

Main Results:

Hydroxyapatite-coated carbon composite stems showed significantly greater osseointegration than uncoated ones (p < 0.001). Push-out tests revealed a six-fold increase in interface shear strength in the coated group. Shear stiffness was twelve-fold higher in the hydroxyapatite-coated implants. Titanium alloy stems had the highest shear strength values overall. These implants also showed the most resorptive bone remodeling. The results suggest hydroxyapatite enhances bonding without excessive resorption. Mechanical stability improved significantly with the coating. These findings highlight the potential of hydroxyapatite in implant design.

Conclusions:

The authors concluded that hydroxyapatite coatings significantly enhance osseointegration in carbon composite implants. The increase in interface shear strength and stiffness supports this finding. Titanium alloy stems with porous coatings performed best mechanically. However, these implants showed more resorptive bone remodeling. The results suggest hydroxyapatite may offer a balance between stability and remodeling. The study does not claim hydroxyapatite is essential for success. It proposes that the coating improves outcomes in this canine model. These conclusions are limited to the tested materials and conditions.

Push-out tests were conducted at an average of 7.2 months after implantation.

The authors concluded that hydroxyapatite coatings significantly enhance osseointegration and mechanical stability in carbon composite implants.