Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computational modeling of dendrites.

William L Kath1

  • 1Departments of Applied Mathematics and Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3125, USA.

Journal of Neurobiology
|May 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coordinated molecular and physiological adaptations enable activity at sub-freezing temperatures in the snow fly Chionea alexandriana.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Temperature-driven coordination of circadian transcriptional regulation.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

Temperature-driven coordination of circadian transcriptome regulation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same author

Rapid threat assessment in the Drosophila thermosensory system.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

The E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor <i>Tango10</i> links the core circadian clock to neuropeptide and behavioral rhythms.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same author

Robustness and plasticity in Drosophila heat avoidance.

Nature communications·2021
Same journal

The molecular receptive range of an olfactory receptor in vivo (Drosophila melanogaster Or22a).

Journal of neurobiology·2006
Same journal

Consistent dynamics suggests tight regulation of biophysical parameters in a small network of bursting neurons.

Journal of neurobiology·2006
Same journal

Early condition, song learning, and the volume of song brain nuclei in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Journal of neurobiology·2006
Same journal

L1, beta1 integrin, and cadherins mediate axonal regeneration in the embryonic spinal cord.

Journal of neurobiology·2006
Same journal

Singing, but not seizure, induces synaptotagmin IV in zebra finch song circuit nuclei.

Journal of neurobiology·2006
Same journal

Developmental regulation of sensory axon regeneration in the absence of growth cones.

Journal of neurobiology·2006
See all related articles

Computational neuroscience utilizes models to explain brain functions like action potentials. This review covers dendritic computational models, their methods, limitations, and insights into neuronal function.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Computational methods have long been integral to neuroscience, aiding in understanding phenomena like action potentials.
  • Recent advances in patch-electrode techniques have uncovered complex dendritic biophysics and synaptic integration.
  • This has spurred the development of computational models specifically for dendrites.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing computational models of dendrites.
  • To elucidate the working principles of these computational techniques.
  • To discuss their limitations and the potential knowledge gained from dendritic modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Review of computational modeling approaches for neuronal dendrites.
  • Analysis of techniques used to simulate dendritic function and synaptic integration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of model validation and predictive capabilities.
  • Main Results:

    • Dendritic computational models offer valuable explanations for experimental findings in neuronal biophysics.
    • These models illuminate the complex processes of synaptic integration within dendrites.
    • Modeling predicts potential behaviors and guides future experimental research.

    Conclusions:

    • Computational modeling is essential for advancing our understanding of dendritic function.
    • The review highlights the utility and limitations of current dendritic models.
    • Further development and application of these models promise deeper insights into neural computation.