Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Significance testing for small microarray experiments.

Charles Kooperberg1, Aaron Aragaki, Andrew D Strand

  • 1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. clk@fhcrc.org

Statistics in Medicine
|May 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trials and Clinical Practice: A Review.

JAMA·2024
Same author

Fine-mapping analysis including over 254,000 East Asian and European descendants identifies 136 putative colorectal cancer susceptibility genes.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Time-to-Event Genome-Wide Association Study for Incident Cardiovascular Disease in People With Type 2 Diabetes.

Diabetes care·2024
Same author

MagicalRsq-X: A cross-cohort transferable genotype imputation quality metric.

American journal of human genetics·2024
Same author

MUSSEL: Enhanced Bayesian polygenic risk prediction leveraging information across multiple ancestry groups.

Cell genomics·2024
Same author

Methylation patterns associated with C-reactive protein in racially and ethnically diverse populations.

Epigenetics·2024
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Subgroup Analysis of Interval-censored Failure Time Data With Application to Alzheimer's Disease.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Rejoinder to Commentaries on "A Perspective on the Appropriate Implementation of ICH E9(R1) Addendum Strategies for Handling Intercurrent Events".

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Multi-Stage Drop-the-Loser Design With Superiority Boundaries.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable ROI Identification in Brain Image Analysis: Overcoming CNN Black Box Challenges With Kriging-Enhanced Adaptive Sampling.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

For small sample sizes in microarray experiments, standard t-tests lack power. Empirical Bayes and experiment-combining methods best identify differentially expressed genes while minimizing false positives.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Microarray experiments with few repeats (less than five per condition) pose challenges for traditional significance testing.
  • Standard statistical tests require extreme results for gene significance, especially after multiple comparison corrections, leading to low power.
  • Existing literature proposes various methods to address small sample size issues, including variance moderation and data pooling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of different statistical approaches for identifying differentially expressed genes in low-replicate microarray experiments.
  • To evaluate methods based on empirical Bayes and experiment combination against standard t-tests.
  • To determine which approaches offer the best balance between statistical power and control of false positives.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of several statistical significance testing approaches.
  • Evaluation using datasets with identical experimental conditions (expecting few significant genes).
  • Assessment using datasets with differing experimental conditions (expecting significant gene identification).

Main Results:

  • Standard t-tests demonstrate very low power in small sample size scenarios.
  • Empirical Bayes methods and approaches combining similar experiments show superior performance.
  • These preferred methods effectively balance the identification of true positives with the control of false positives.

Conclusions:

  • Empirical Bayes and experiment-combining strategies are recommended for significance testing in low-replicate microarray studies.
  • Standard t-tests are inadequate and should be avoided when dealing with small sample sizes.
  • The choice of statistical test significantly impacts the reliability and interpretability of microarray experiment results.