Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Development of an Innovative LED-based Illumination Device for In Vitro Application of Photodynamic Therapy with Rose Bengal
Published on: September 12, 2025
Evaluation of a dual peak third generation LED curing light
Richard B T Price1, Corey A Felix, Pantelis Andreou
1Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Abstract:
This study compared 3 light-emitting diode curing lights (UltraLume 5, FreeLight 2, LEDemetron I) with a quartz-tungsten-halogen light (Optilux 401) to determine which was the better at photopolymerizing 5 resin composites. The composites were 2 mm thick and were irradiated for the manufacturers' recommended curing times at distances of 2 mm and 8 mm from the light guide. The Knoop hardness at each of 22 points over a 10-mm diameter footprint at the top and bottom of the composites was used to compare the lights. The 4 curing lights and irradiation distances did not have the same effect on all the composites (P < .001). It was concluded that overall the UltraLume 5 dual peak third generation LED curing light was able to polymerize these 5 resin composites as well as or better than the other curing lights.
More Related Videos
10:42In Depth Analyses of LEDs by a Combination of X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Light Microscopy (LM) Correlated with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Published on: June 16, 2016
11:04An In-House-Built and Light-Emitting-Diode-Based Photodynamic Therapy Device for Enhancing Verteporfin Cytotoxicity in a 2D Cell Culture Model
Published on: January 13, 2023