Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026
Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) with Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Effective comparison of two auto-CPAP devices for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea based on polysomnographic
Hai-Bo Shi1, Lei Cheng, Meiho Nakayama
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan; Sendai Snoring Research Centre, Miyoshi ENT Clinic, Sendai 981-3133, Japan.
Background:
Automatic continuous positive airway pressure (auto-CPAP) machines differ mainly in algorithms used for respiratory event detection and pressure control. The auto-CPAP machines operated by novel algorithms are expected to have better performance than the earlier ones in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to determine the therapeutic characteristics between two different auto-CPAP devices, i.e., the third-generation flow-based (f-APAP) and the second-generation vibration-based (v-APAP) machines, during the first night treatment of OSAS.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the polysomnography (PSG) recordings of 43 OSAS patients who were initially performed an overnight diagnostic PSG to confirm the disease and afterwards received the first night auto-CPAP treatment with using either the f-APAP (n=22) or v-APAP (n=21) device under another PSG evaluation.
Results:
There were 13.6% and 61.9% patients who remained a residual apnea/hypopnea index more than 5 during the f-APAP and v-APAP application, respectively (P<0.005). The f-APAP was more effective than the v-APAP in reducing apnea/hypopnea index (P=0.003), hypopnea index (P=0.023) and apnea index (P=0.007), improving the lowest oxygen saturation index (P=0.007) and shortening stage 1 sleep (P=0.016). However, the f-APAP was less sufficient than the v-APAP in reducing arousal/awakening index (P=0.02).
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that the f-APAP works better than the v-APAP in abolishing breathing abnormities in the treatment of OSAS; however, the f-APAP device might still have some potential limitations in the clinical application.
