Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving research supervision in nursing.

David R Thompson1, Sandy Kirkman, Roger Watson

  • 1Nethersole School of Nursing, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, China. davidthompson@cuhk.edu.hk

Nurse Education Today
|May 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychosocial assessment and psychological interventions following a cardiac event.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2023
Same author

Which Females Have the Highest Rates of Depression and Anxiety Following Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Cardiology·2022
Same author

Fake news: The research reproducibility crisis.

International journal of nursing studies·2022
Same author

Co-Design of an eHealth Intervention to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Male Taxi Drivers: ManGuard.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022
Same author

Nursing's leadership illusion? Time for more inclusive, credible and clearer conceptions of leadership and leaders.

Journal of advanced nursing·2022
Same author

The cardiac distress inventory: A new measure of psychosocial distress associated with an acute cardiac event.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2022
Same journal

Strategies to support first-year nursing students' transition to higher education: An integrative review.

Nurse education today·2026
Same journal

Historical trauma-based education and nursing professional identity: A qualitative analysis of reflective essays.

Nurse education today·2026
Same journal

The Resource Gadgets Pedagogical Framework: A conceptual model for lecturer-guided mobile learning in resource-constrained nursing education.

Nurse education today·2026
Same journal

Academic overload, ChatGPT use, and resilience: Parallel mediating pathways to academic stress among nursing students.

Nurse education today·2026
Same journal

Generative artificial intelligence literacy for learning and individual creativity: A cross-sectional study among nursing students.

Nurse education today·2026
Same journal

Advancing antimicrobial stewardship through the One Health Stewardship Competency Model for Nursing.

Nurse education today·2026
See all related articles

This paper provides guidance on effective research supervision, emphasizing rigorous student and supervisor selection, clear project development, and fair examination processes for postgraduate research degrees.

Area of Science:

  • Higher Education
  • Research Management
  • Academic Development

Background:

  • Research supervision is crucial for novice researchers, academic staff, and overall research output.
  • Increased academic accountability necessitates integrating good supervision into quality research governance.
  • The study references the HEFCE document 'Improving standards in postgraduate research degree programmes' (2003).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To offer guidance on research supervision based on international researcher experiences.
  • To advocate for the adoption of improved standards in postgraduate research degree programs.
  • To enhance the quality and governance of research supervision.

Main Methods:

  • Expert guidance from four experienced researchers (UK, China, Australia).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis and application of recommendations from the HEFCE 2003 document.
  • Focus on practical aspects of research supervision and program standards.

    • Main Results:

    • Recommendations for adopting improved standards in postgraduate research programs.
    • Emphasis on rigorous selection of research students and supervisors.
    • Need for developed departmental procedures for monitoring, feedback, and intellectual property management.

    Conclusions:

    • Adoption of proposed standards is recommended for quality research supervision.
    • Rigorous selection, project development, and transparent examination are key.
    • Effective research supervision requires adequate resourcing within a governance framework.