Related Experiment Videos
Oral fluid collection: the neglected variable in oral fluid testing.
1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. dcrouch@alanine.pharm.utah.edu
Forensic Science International
|May 19, 2005
Summary
Oral fluid drug testing is promising, but collection methods significantly impact results. Variables in collection technique and devices can alter drug concentrations, affecting test accuracy and interpretation.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Toxicology
- Analytical Chemistry
- Clinical Chemistry
Background:
- Oral fluid (OF) is a promising alternative specimen for drug testing due to ease of collection.
- OF drug concentrations may reflect blood-drug levels, offering value in clinical and forensic settings.
- The impact of OF collection procedures on drug detection and quantification is often overlooked.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of various oral fluid collection methods on drug concentrations.
- To evaluate the influence of collection techniques, devices, and storage conditions on drug stability and recovery.
- To assess the potential of endogenous markers for oral fluid specimen validity.
Main Methods:
- Controlled clinical study comparing different stimulation methods (acidic, mechanical, commercial devices) for codeine collection.
- In vitro experiments assessing collection volume, recovery rates, and drug recovery (amphetamines, opiates, cocaine, THC, PCP) from commercial devices.
- Evaluation of THC stability in collection buffer under different storage conditions (frozen, refrigerated, room temperature).
- Preliminary experiments on the effect of water rinsing on IgG concentration as a specimen validity marker.
Main Results:
- Collection technique significantly affected codeine OF concentrations, with non-stimulating methods yielding higher concentrations than stimulated methods or commercial devices.
- In vitro recovery rates for various drugs varied considerably between commercial devices (e.g., amphetamines 16-59%, THC 0-53%).
- THC stability was good when frozen but marginal under refrigeration and poor at room temperature.
- Water rinsing did not significantly reduce IgG concentration below proposed validity criteria.
Conclusions:
- Collection method, device type, and storage conditions are critical variables that can significantly alter oral fluid drug concentrations.
- These variables can confound the interpretation of oral fluid drug test results.
- Further research and standardization are needed to address these collection-related effects in oral fluid drug testing.