Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Categorical reasoning from multiple diagrams.

Maxwell J Roberts1, Elizabeth D A Sykes

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK. mjr@essex.ac.uk

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|May 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Survey on Transit Map Layout - from Design, Machine, and Human Perspectives.

Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics·2020
Same author

Deductive reasoning in children with specific language impairment.

The British journal of developmental psychology·2010
Same author

Explaining inappropriate strategy selection in a simple reasoning task.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2007
Same author

Expanding the universe of categorical syllogisms: a challenge for reasoning researchers.

Behavior research methods·2006
Same author

Belief bias and relational reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2003
Same author

The elusive matching bias effect in the disjunctive selection task.

Experimental psychology·2002
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Syllogistic reasoning errors persist even when initial representation stages are bypassed. This suggests conclusion identification difficulties, not just representation errors, significantly impact reasoning performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Reasoning
  • Logic

Background:

  • Syllogistic reasoning is typically viewed as a multi-stage process involving quantifier interpretation, representation construction, and conclusion identification.
  • Existing theories often attribute reasoning errors to issues in representation construction (e.g., mental models theory).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of conclusion identification in syllogistic reasoning errors.
  • To contrast representation-based explanations with conclusion identification-based explanations of reasoning performance.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using diagrams analogous to Euler circles to bypass initial reasoning stages.
  • Participants identified valid conclusions from these pre-constructed representations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Phenomena typically associated with syllogistic reasoning persisted despite the removal of representation stages.
  • Performance patterns suggest that errors are not solely due to representation construction issues.

Conclusions:

  • Conclusion identification difficulties offer a novel explanation for persistent syllogistic reasoning errors.
  • Both representation and conclusion identification factors likely contribute to reasoning performance, with the latter requiring further investigation.