Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two principles of premise integration in spatial reasoning.

Robin Hörnig1, Klaus Oberauer, Andrea Weidenfeld

  • 1University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. rhoernig@rz.uni-potsdam.de

Memory & Cognition
|May 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Spatial reasoning is easier when the second premise (P2) follows two principles: the anaphor is the given information (relatum) and is mentioned first (given-new). Word order significantly impacts comprehension ease.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reliability, bias, and computational cost of estimating the Bayes factor using bridge sampling and the Savage-Dickey density ratio.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

How is free time used in complex span tasks?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Does the benefit of time for working memory arise at encoding or retrieval?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Revisiting the retro-cue benefit: Why does focusing attention result in improved memory performance?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Forget For Now, but Remember Later: Can People Selectively Remove Information From Working Memory While Keeping it in Long-Term Memory?

Journal of cognition·2026

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Understanding how humans integrate information from multiple sentences is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Relational premises in spatial reasoning present unique challenges for information integration.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing sentence comprehension, but specific principles for spatial relational integration require further elucidation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and test principles that facilitate the integration of two relational premises in spatial reasoning.
  • To investigate the impact of anaphoric roles (relatum vs. non-relatum) and information order (given-new vs. new-given) within the second premise (P2).
  • To examine how word order variations (canonical vs. topicalized) interact with these principles.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental manipulation of word order in relational premises.
  • Measurement of P2 comprehension times as an indicator of integration ease.
  • Analysis of comprehension data based on adherence to proposed integration principles (relatum-as-given, given-new).

Main Results:

  • Sentence integration was easiest when P2 satisfied both proposed principles (relatum-as-given and given-new).
  • Integration was most difficult when P2 violated both principles.
  • Canonical premises, where principles often conflict, showed intermediate comprehension difficulty.
  • These effects were consistent irrespective of whether the anaphor was a definite description or a pronoun.

Conclusions:

  • Two key principles—anaphor as relatum and the given-new information order—significantly facilitate spatial relational premise integration.
  • Topicalization can align word order with these principles, enhancing comprehension.
  • Findings provide empirical support for specific cognitive mechanisms underlying spatial reasoning and language comprehension.