Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual and proprioceptive representations in spatial memory.

Naohide Yamamoto1, Amy L Shelton

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. yamamoto@jhu.edu

Memory & Cognition
|May 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multisensory causal inference prior is attenuated in musicians and is further attenuated following instruction.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

The latency of a domain-general visual surprise signal is attribute dependent.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

What visually directed action reveals about perception of ambulatory space.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Behavioural and electrophysiological modulations of onset primacy in visual change detection.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Effects of short- and long-term experience on two classical measures of the multisensory temporal integration window.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

An event-related potential study of onset primacy in visual change detection.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Spatial memories are orientation-dependent, whether learned visually or through proprioception. The brain may create distinct reference systems for each sensory input, impacting spatial representation.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Spatial information is crucial for navigation and interaction with the environment.
  • Both visual and non-visual (proprioceptive) senses contribute to acquiring spatial knowledge.
  • Understanding how different sensory modalities are integrated in spatial memory is key to cognitive neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the orientation dependence of spatial memories acquired through visual and proprioceptive learning.
  • To explore how the brain represents spatial information when learned via different sensory modalities.
  • To determine if distinct reference systems are established based on visual versus proprioceptive learning.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Participants learned spatial environments using either visual or proprioceptive cues alone.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2: Participants learned the same environment under different orientations using both visual and proprioceptive cues.
  • Spatial memory recall and orientation judgments were assessed after learning.

    • Main Results:

    • Spatial memories acquired through both visual learning and proprioceptive learning were found to be orientation-dependent.
    • Participants established and utilized separate spatial reference systems for visually learned and proprioceptively learned environments.
    • The representation of spatial information differed based on the primary sensory modality used for learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Both vision and proprioception independently contribute to orientation-dependent spatial memory.
    • The brain constructs distinct spatial reference frames based on the sensory modality of learning.
    • Different sensory modalities provide unique inputs that shape our internal spatial representations.