Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Ischemic mitral regurgitation: revascularization alone versus revascularization and mitral valve repair
Yong-Hwan Kim1, Lawrence S C Czer, Harmik J Soukiasian
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048-1865, USA.
Background:
In this study we compared the surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) by revascularization alone and by revascularization combined with mitral valve repair.
Methods:
We studied 355 patients who underwent revascularization alone (n = 168) or revascularization combined with mitral valve repair (n = 187) for IMR from March 1994 to September 2003. Preoperative and operative characteristics, postoperative mitral regurgitation severity, operative mortality, and late survival were examined for each surgical group.
Results:
No differences were noted between the two groups in age, sex, history of diabetes or hypertension, and number of bypass grafts. The combined surgical group had a lower preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (0.38 +/- 0.14 versus 0.44 +/- 0.15), greater severity of IMR, higher frequency of prior myocardial infarction, and longer cross-clamp and pump times (p < 0.01). The combined surgical group had a greater reduction in IMR grade (2.7 +/- 0.1 grades versus 0.2 +/- 0.1 grade), a lower postoperative IMR grade (0.9 +/- 0.1 versus 2.3 +/- 0.1), and a higher success with reduction of IMR by two or more grades (89% versus 11%) (p < 0.001). In patients with 3+ or 4+ IMR, both groups had similar operative mortality (11.0% in the combined group compared with 4.7% for revascularization alone, p = 0.11) and actuarial survival at 5 years (44% +/- 5% versus 41% +/- 7%, p = 0.53). Independently predictive of higher early mortality (< or = 30 days) by Cox analysis were longer pump time (p < 0.001) and older age (p < 0.02). Predictive of late mortality (> 30 days) were older age (p < 0.001), fewer bypass grafts (p < 0.01), and lower ejection fraction (p < 0.01). After adjustment for these variables, there was a trend (p = 0.08) toward a higher late survival with the combined surgical procedure.
Conclusions:
In patients with IMR, combined mitral valve repair and revascularization resulted in less postoperative mitral regurgitation and similar 5-year survival when compared with revascularization alone. Attempts to reduce pump time by using off-pump techniques may reduce early mortality in these high-risk patients.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

