Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating feature-category relations using semantic fluency tasks.

Paulo Ventura1, José Morais, Régine Kolinsky

  • 1Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal. paulo.ventura@fpce.ul.pt

Brain and Cognition
|May 28, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond source vs. content: how people combine multiple cues in news credibility assessment.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same author

Category specificity in holistic processing: Reciprocal face-word interference does not extend to body stimuli.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Have I seen you before? Evaluating the learning of naturalistic faces and faces in art.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Laterality in face paintings of renaissance and cubism art styles.

Laterality·2025
Same author

Mask dynamics in eye region-based person identification: Effects of mask removal and addition.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

A window into intracellular events in myositis through subcellular proteomics.

Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]·2025
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals that sensory cues best retrieve information about living things, while functional cues are better for nonliving things, supporting distinct semantic memory representations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Theories propose that semantic memory, the knowledge of concepts, relies on distinct features.
  • Warrington and colleagues suggested sensory and functional-associative features differentially represent living and nonliving things.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential importance of sensory versus functional-associative semantic features in retrieving knowledge about living and nonliving things.
  • To test the hypothesis that sensory features are primary for living things and functional features for nonliving things.

Main Methods:

  • Eight adaptations of the semantic fluency task were employed.
  • Participants were cued with either sensory or functional-associative features to generate responses for living and nonliving categories.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • More living thing responses and semantic clusters were generated using sensory cues compared to functional-associative cues.
  • The opposite pattern emerged for nonliving things, with more responses and clusters generated from functional-associative cues.

Conclusions:

  • Empirical evidence supports the distinct roles of sensory and functional-associative properties in semantic memory.
  • Sensory properties are fundamental to the semantic representation of living things.
  • Functional-associative properties are fundamental to the semantic representation of nonliving things.