Evaluation of nine strategies for analyzing a cDNA toxicology microarray data set
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
Published on: October 5, 2016
Juan Joanne Zhang1, Tsong Yi, Lue Ping Zhao
1Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20857, USA. zhangjua@cder.fda.gov
Abstract:
Microarray technology with two-color-based cDNA is commonly used for drug development, as well as for a much broader range of biomedical research. Among all the applications, two-group design is probably most commonly used for comparing, e.g., normal and abnormal tissue samples, tissues treated and untreated, or individuals responded and not responded to a drug. Despite the apparent simplicity, there are numerous methods for analyzing such data in a statistically rigorous manner. Here, we discuss nine different analytical strategies, each of which is derived under a set of "reasonable" assumptions. Some of them resemble methods developed for different contexts. In the absence of the truth, investigators should consider underlying assumptions before taking one or more of these strategies for analyzing data from a particular experiment. The issue here is what are the similarities and differences between these analytical strategies. We present these strategies in the context of an actual microarray experiment performed at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

