[Impact of coronary sirolimus-eluting stents on long-term outcome in diabetic patients]
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Yue-hua Fang1, Wei-feng Shen, Rui-yan Zhang
1Department of Cardiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200025, China.
Insights
Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) show similar long-term cardiac event rates compared to bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with diabetes. However, SES may reduce major adverse cardiac events in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Context:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) management involves percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation.
- Diabetic patients represent a high-risk population for adverse cardiovascular outcomes post-PCI.
- Evaluating the long-term efficacy of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in this population is crucial.
Purpose:
- To compare the long-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), specifically analyzing the impact of diabetes mellitus.
- To assess the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and MACE-free survival rates at one year following PCI in diabetic and non-diabetic patients treated with SES or BMS.
Summary:
- A study of 1004 patients (84 diabetic, 250 non-diabetic with SES; 168 diabetic, 502 non-diabetic with BMS) found similar MACE rates and one-year MACE-free survival between diabetic and non-diabetic patients receiving SES (4.8% vs. 3.6% MACE).
- Patients receiving BMS showed significantly higher MACE occurrence (31.0% vs. 21.7%, P=0.015) and lower one-year MACE-free survival (74.2% vs. 86.8%, P=0.001) in diabetic compared to non-diabetic individuals.
- Follow-up averaged 16.2 months.
Impact:
- Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) demonstrate comparable long-term safety and efficacy to bare metal stents (BMS) in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
- The findings suggest that SES implantation may be a beneficial strategy for reducing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and the need for repeat interventions in diabetic patients undergoing PCI.
- This research highlights the importance of stent selection in managing diabetic patients with CAD to optimize long-term cardiovascular outcomes.
Objective:
To analyse the impact of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) on long-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes.
Methods:
Among 1004 patients with CAD undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 84 diabetic and 250 non-diabetic patients received SES, 168 diabetic and 502 non-diabetic patients had bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. Baseline clinical characteristics, interventional procedures (coronary angiography and PCI), occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and MACE-free survival rates at one year during follow-up were compared.
Results:
During follow-up (average 16.2 months), patients (with and without diabetes mellitus) who received SES had similar occurrence of MACE (4.8% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.744) and MACE-free survival rates at one year (95.0% vs. 96.7%, P = 0.602). However those received BMS had a higher occurrence of MACE in diabetes mellitus than that in non-diabetic patients (31.0% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.015). MACE-free survival rate at one year was lower in diabetic patients with BMS than that in non-diabetic patients with BMS (74.2% vs. 86.8%, P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
Implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents may reduce the major adverse cardiac events and the frequency of repeat intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetic Nephropathy
Diabetic Retinopathy
Complications of Diabetes Mellitus