Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative evaluation of strain-based and model-based modulus elastography.

Marvin M Doyley1, Seshadri Srinivasan, Sarah A Pendergrass

  • 1Department of Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. marvin.m.doyley@dartmouth.edu

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
|June 7, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain MR Elastography Metrics Associated with Alterations in Learning and Memory in People with HIV.

Research square·2026
Same author

Transcriptomic Comparison of Soybean Roots Inoculated with Different Rhizobium Strains During Early Symbiosis.

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Progressive and concordant alterations in transcriptional and gut microbiota across aortic valve calcification severity.

Microbiology spectrum·2025
Same author

Merging Single-Track Location Elastographic Imaging with the Frequency Shift Method improves Shear Wave Attenuation Measurements.

Frontiers in physics·2025
Same author

A Hybrid Model Combining U-Net and Transformers for Joint Segmentation and Beamforming of Plane-wave Ultrasound Images.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2025
Same author

A phenome-wide association study of uterine fibroids reveals a marked burden of comorbidities.

Communications medicine·2025
Same journal

Cardiac Natural Mechanical Wave Detection and Speed Estimation Using Deep Learning-Based 2-D Ultrasound Imaging: A Feasibility Study.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Simulating the Dedifferentiation Process of Thyroid Cancer: Insights from Mouse Models and Ultrasound Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

A Nomogram Based on Ultrasound Features for Predicting Major Intra-Operative Hemorrhage in Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS).

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

MedLP-HAFB-CLIP: Hierarchical Adaptive Large Model With Learnable Medical Prompts for Level II Ultrasound Standard Plane Identification.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
Same journal

Data Assimilating B-splines for Model-based Regularization in Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2026
See all related articles

Solving the inverse elasticity problem (IEP) in elastography offers superior contrast transfer efficiency, especially for high modulus contrasts, compared to standard strain imaging methods.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Ultrasound Elastography

Background:

  • Current strain imaging elastography faces challenges with mechanical artifacts and limited contrast transfer efficiency.
  • The inverse elasticity problem (IEP) offers a potential solution but is often hindered by its ill-posed nature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the quality of modulus elastograms derived from solving the IEP against those from standard strain imaging.
  • To evaluate the performance of model-based versus strain-based modulus elastograms using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR(e)) and contrast transfer efficiency (CTE(e)).

Main Methods:

  • Computed strain-based and model-based modulus elastograms from simulated and gelatin phantoms with varying inclusion sizes and modulus contrasts.
  • Evaluated elastogram quality using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR(e)) and contrast transfer efficiency (CTE(e)) metrics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Strain-based and model-based elastograms showed statistically equivalent CNR(e) at a fixed spatial resolution.
  • CTE(e) was comparable for both methods at low modulus contrasts.
  • Model-based elastograms demonstrated superior CTE(e) at high modulus contrasts.

Conclusions:

  • Solving the IEP (model-based elastography) provides superior contrast transfer efficiency in high modulus contrast scenarios.
  • This suggests the IEP approach holds promise for overcoming limitations of standard strain imaging in specific applications.